Hopefully my last post on this site! I said it first..right here, today also!

maccoshus · 01-05-2021, 09:47 PM · 1 person reading this discussion

#1
http://thesaker.is/we-are-at-war/

Quote:by Peter Koenig for the Saker Blog

We are at war. Yes. And I don’t mean the west against the east, against Russa and China, nor the entire world against an invisible corona virus. No. We, the common people, are at war against an ever more authoritarian and tyrannical elitist Globalist system, reigned by a small group of multi-billionaires, that planned already decades ago to take power over the people, to control them reduce them to what a minute elite believes is an “adequate number” to inhabit Mother Earth – and to digitize and robotize the rest of the survivors, as a sort of serfs. It’s a combination of George Orwell’s “1984” and Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World”.

Welcome to the age of the transhumans. If we allow it. That’s why vaccination is needed in warp speed, to inject us with transgenic substances that may change our DNA, lest we may wake up, or at least a critical mass may become conscious – and change the dynamics. Because dynamics are not predictable, especially not in the long-term.

The war is real and the sooner we all realize it, the sooner those in masks and those in social distancing take cognizance of the worldwide dystopian situations we have allowed to become our governments, the better our chance to retake our sovereign selves. Today we are confronted with totally illegal and oppressive rules, all imposed under the pretext of “health protection”. Non-obedience is punishable by huge fines; military and police enforced rules: Mask wearing, social distancing, keeping within the allowed radius of our “homes”, quarantining, staying away from our friends and families.

#2
Okay

#3
that is what those vaccines are about. those who pull the strings here are not paying attention to comprehensive social context at all. all they want are people to go get the vaccine as if they are in th employ of Bill Gates the vaccine man himself.

but capitalism has failed and the people must be controlled. the only way that can be achieved is to kill off most of the people and biologically engineer the rest. and that is what has been set into motion by the elites...as clear as day. very simple to see, to figure out

there is not a single Covid regulation...strangulation of society really... that does not divide the people, keep them away from each other thus seeking to prevent revolution as capitalism has failed finally, totally. you cant leave society as normal at times like these here and now. the people will meet and talk ad Bam! Revolution!

the prevention of revolution is what this is all about...Covid-19. as well as setting the stage for what is to follow Covid: a Brave New World of the scientific control of the human population.

get ready for it! or fight it to the death for ordinary human existence in the world to come under Bill Gates' control is going to be like death for all of us

#4
chairman post=387991 Wrote:Okay

good you are going to remove my membership. so long man! I am gone!

#5
Bill Gates crap has been DEBUNKED so many Times.

and this TRINI still in PICONG mode on de Man !

#6
maccoshus post=387990 Today we are confronted [color=red Wrote:with totally illegal and oppressive rules[/color]
all imposed under the pretext of “health protection”.
Non-obedience is punishable by huge fines; military and police enforced rules:
Mask wearing, social distancing, keeping within the allowed radius of our “homes”,
quarantining, staying away from our friends and families.
See how Dangerous these BLOWHARDS can be ????

FALSE, SENSATIONALISM and Total LIES !

INCITEMENT to get INFECTED.

#7
Here is a politician I respect! why?

she has been totally blocked at every point. she is not allowed to progress, to move on up. that is the sure sig of an honest politician: an honest person in this culture period. just compare her to the Current 'vice president elect' kamla Harris, another part Indian woman. they gave the house and the land to Harris most undeservedly.

Harris could not get to first base as a campaigner for president but they gave her the white house anyway. why? that is to my way of reasoning that Harris is a total controlled traitor who as president will do the bidding of her elitist handlers

Harris gives off the impression of a mouse, a rat and a treacherous person. Tulsi Gabbard gives off an impression of a straight and confident person who more than less speaks truth every time she has to speak. by her content as well: Gabbard talks no shit about silly issues. she tackles important issues always, pulls no punches that I have seen, even criticizes her own party and its leadership mercilessly when she thinks she has to

in american culture, especially in the public space, to get anywhere you must sell out, compromise yourself to the elites to be trusted by them and allowed to progress. if you have not done that you will be blocked. Gabbard very clearly has been blocked in her political career, cannot get the financing necessary to run effective campaigns anymore

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/01/0...dered-word


Quote:Standing up like this will not get her anywhere with the elites but the people surely love and respect her, which is why she keeps getting re-elected to her congressional seat

Quote:US House Representative Tulsi Gabbard has decried the lawmakers’ “hypocrisy” in the new rules banning gendered words such as mother, father, brother and sister.

The outspoken Democrat from Hawaii appeared on Fox News, which is close to Republicans, to censure the latest code of conduct passed by the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives.

"It's the height of hypocrisy for people who claim to be the champions of rights for women to deny the very biological existence of women," Gabbard said.



Tulsi Gabbard blasts the new House rules that get rid of "gendered language" on Tucker:

"It’s the height of hypocrisy for people who claim to be the champions of rights for women to deny the biological existence of women." pic.twitter.com/eoQEl1QNWR

— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) January 5, 2021

#8
watch out chairman!!!!!

Quote:Deh are goin' to come and get you fuh hosting the Scientist, Koenig and Tulsi... if ketchim have anything to do with it.

I sooprize ketchim not inviggling about the porn posts an' dem. how come dem thread an dem not lock yet?.

King Inviggler go soon get to dem. I mean de inviggling S'king!

#9
WHAT AMERICANS SAY ABOUT DR FAUCI. IT IS NOT WHAT KETCHM SAYS ABOUT FAUCI. INDEED IT IS QUITE THE OPPOSITE

https://www.thedailyfodder.com/2020/12/l...virus.html

The use of universal lockdowns in the event of the appearance of a new pathogen has no precedent. It has been a science experiment in real time, with most of the human population used as lab rats. The costs are legion.

The question is whether lockdowns worked to control the virus in a way that is scientifically verifiable. Based on the following studies, the answer is no and for a variety of reasons: bad data, no correlations, no causal demonstration, anomalous exceptions, and so on. There is no relationship between lockdowns (or whatever else people want to call them to mask their true nature) and virus control.

Perhaps this is a shocking revelation, given that universal social and economic controls are becoming the new orthodoxy. In a saner world, the burden of proof really should belong to the lockdowners, since it is they who overthrew 100 years of public-health wisdom and replaced it with an untested, top-down imposition on freedom and human rights. They never accepted that burden. They took it as axiomatic that a virus could be intimidated and frightened by credentials, edicts, speeches, and masked gendarmes.

The pro-lockdown evidence is shockingly thin, and based largely on comparing real-world outcomes against dire computer-generated forecasts derived from empirically untested models, and then merely positing that stringencies and “nonpharmaceutical interventions” account for the difference between the fictionalized vs. the real outcome. The anti-lockdown studies, on the other hand, are evidence-based, robust, and thorough, grappling with the data we have (with all its flaws) and looking at the results in light of controls on the population.

#10
maccoshus post=388004 Wrote:The question is whether lockdowns worked to control the virus in a way that is scientifically verifiable.
Science is in the public domain !

Watching the Crowds Live! at the cricket Test match in NEW ZEALAND is verifiable!

[color=blue]BUT New Zealand locked down and NOW they are enjoying Freedom

to ENJOY a 5 day TEST match cricket Game.

while LOSERS are dying because they want NO Lockdowns : Pittay !

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)