Hair we need !

Unlike hairy chimpanzees and bonobos – and all other primates –

most of our skin is on display. We have evolved this way, even though fur is beneficial:

it insulates and protects the skin, and in some cases acts as a useful camouflage.

So if it is so advantageous, why did we lose so much of it?

It might not seem strange, because we are used to having relatively little hair

covering our bodies. But when we compare ourselves to the rest of the mammals,

and our closest living ape cousins, it is downright bizarre that we are the only

large-bodied mammal with so little of it  :-\

and yet you shave off the little you have.

nature learning as it goes  :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[

"No one supposes that the nakedness of the skin is any direct advantage to man;

his body, therefore, cannot have been divested of hair through natural selection,"

Charles Darwin wrote in The Descent of Man


It was Charles Darwin who first taught the public that humans are descended

from an ape-like ancestor.

He also wondered why we had so little hair..

He proposed that we lost much of our fur due to sexual selection:

we preferred hairless mates, and that is why hairlessness became common  :-[

but how does that make sense?  i don't understand.

Charles is not around to explain

Between two and three millions years ago our ancestors began to inhabit

more open savannahs. This meant they were out in the Sun's glaring heat for many

more hours each day...

This move into open spaces offered an explanation for our lack of hair !!

Our closest living relatives have much more hair than us