Quote:most journalists cannot criticize wicb or else they will blackballed.
but if they do not criticize west indies cricket when it needs to be, then they contribute greatly to crickets demise.. for the wicb is in a death mode, in the total grip of a parasitic bureaucracy.
they participated in the destruction of the body on which they are attached for their livelihood, in the mistaken view that short tern subservience makes for long term gain.
in the case of the wicb short term compliance by journos has meant they will soon end up looking for a new job.ย or else look to cover west indian village cricket as a means of life.ย
who anywhere are interested in west indies village cricket with sustained focus, enough to pay those arseholes money, sufficient to maintain their big homes ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::
at points in life there are always heavy decisions to make, full of grave risks..but without the right response life can get even more grave.
west indies cricket journos, including Crozier...in fact Crozier most of all... were wedded to the rotten system that produced the wicb.ย they never dealt faithfully by it
Crozier attacked the wcb on personal grounds...an issue that threatened his standing as a journo... not on matters of of wicb administrative malfeasance that threatens the life of west indies cricket.
deh say it not good to speak ill of the dead.ย but this is not speaking ill of the dead..just a truth about Croziers contribution to the game. it was not good overall at all, in my estimation.ย
all the great celebratory noise about Crozier is just hypocrisy to me