[quote author=briannagodess link=topic=103402.msg686582#msg686582 date=1459110127]
There are actually different theories of where humans originated:
1. The Out of Africa theory where theorists claim that we originated from Africa and from there, settled into India and other continents.
2. The Eurasia theory which is contradictory to the above theory. This theory claims that the first humans are not indigenous to India but came from Caucasus Mountains.
3. The Multi-Species theory claiming that different species of humans have lived simultaneously at the same times in different regions or locations.
I am leaning towards the Multi-Species theory though since there really is an overlap with the discovery of skulls of ancient men and the supposed time they lived on earth.
[/quote]
nonsense. why yuh leaning to multi species..which is some variation of the Carlton Coonian theory of many different origins of humanity ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::
there is nutten to support any such idea. if simultaneous types an many sites of origin, humanity should be different to some degree biologically..relative to sites of origin. as far as I know there are no such differences in humanity...PERIOD.
all blood, mitochondria/DNA are the same. all sorts of crossing is possible like blood transfusions/transplants. if humanity was so separate none of those thing would be possible. it is difficult enough as it is with such identity of origin. imagine if it was not so indeed.
also habitation...there is no european/asian habitation all the way back. there is only one place in the world where that took place. ..the only location in which it could have happened for the ICE covered the earth for exceedingly long periods of time.
you see the chronology of the flow of time and that is known to have happened must marry up to permit life and where it took place ..evolved into intelligent humanity and civilization...one place according to the convergence of all factors.
then the factors of the development of speech/thought, tools, the codification of the time cycles, the 2 great years...precession of the equinoxes a 26k year process....and the 29K great year........
all of that and a whole lot more, came out of one place and one place only.
and ketchim think that black people care...that we are Indian loves and want to claim Indian as black. the black people I know do not care one way or the other what Indians do, what they want to believe in, believe about anything at all.
it is more important to them (us) to know the whole truth and especially how it relates to us now, today and how it fits us out to correct and develop our own situation
what you have to do is get into real history..not mainstream european nonsense. once you do that the evidecne becomes clear..as well as the story it tells.
what I see is that Indian people detest black people and want to have nutten at all to do with black people. the fact that they may be black makes them sick to their stomach. they are looking for all and every way to separate themselves from black people period
It's was always believed that Africa was the place that humans had originated from. Now some are saying it's Asia. Soon there will be arguments and counter arguments from proponents on both sides to validate their claims. Is it of any significant value at this stage to know if whether humans had originated from Africa or Asia?