Hitler was a racist and a bigot, some persons went as far as to label him as being mad. He had a profound hatred for Jews, nonwhites, and short-statured persons. He was embarrassed when Jessie Owens defeated white athletes in the racing events; he believed that black people were inferior. Jessie Owens destroyed this myth that Hitler believed in. Hence, Hitler left the stadium, refusing to present the victory medal to Owens.
[quote author=djcric link=topic=102560.msg677592#msg677592 date=1454954353]
So he shook hands, so?
Britain loved Hitler until he invaded Poland. The British PM Chamberlain agreed to give away Czechoslovakia to Hitler in 1938. Also, Hitler is treated as such a villain, but to me, Chamberlain was just as big a villain. And when people say Churchill was great, I disagree. He was a war mongering lunatic who literally destroyed the British empire. If not for the Soviets and the Americans, history would have proclaimed Churchill as the biggest failure in History.
[/quote]
from what I understand DJ Germany was betrayed after world war 1 made to pay reparations, and to lose territories when the allies promised no such thing on the end of hostilities.
they all turned on Germany, ganged up and twisted the crap out of Germany... which everybody said was bound to cause another war up the road as Germany recovered, and at the very least wanted back its territories back.
that is what Hitler wanted back..German territories. and that is what Chamberlain gave up..what was rightfully
German.
I think I understand a bit of that history up to that point. after that I am lost and look forward to more revelations still under wraps, secrecy. for example why did Germany attack Russia ::confused::
I have seen no explanation, no history that makes sense of that except that Germany and the Jews were in league and they got him him to attack Russia.
the only people who could possibly benefit from that are the Jews. it is the Jews who have a never ending, permanent and corrosive hatred for Russia/Russians, who could possibly have been behind that move.
but how could that be if Hitler was killing Jews in europe, seeking to eliminate them from the world... or at least from europe?
why would the Jews be so thick with Hitler to the point they planned such a huge project together, if Hitler was genociding Jews at the same time.
it does not compute especially when it is now known, that Jewish money men were actually financing Hitler in that war..that as usual they were financing all sides as well.
yet still how could they be financing Hitler and he is killing them ::confused::
is it probable them that Hitler, as some claim was doing no such thing, that there was no holocaust in fact, and that Hitler and the Jews, far from enemies were as thick as thieves ::confused::
that history is far from complete..and what is taught makes no sense. for Hitler to attack Russia is the ill logic of ill logic as far as I see. had Hitler not attacked Russia, had been satisfied with his gains..or regains... and consolidated, england and its allies including the USA could not defeat him.
that is what seems to be the logic in the situation, but he choose to attack Russia and that was that.
why ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused:: Germany did not stand to benefit.
whatever Russia had that Germany wanted, they could have traded for at much less cost and to never-ending mutual benefit and development between the 2 countries..much like it promises to be today..once they get america out of the way of cooperation between Russia and Germany.
America does not want Russian/German cooperation regardless. those are the two most brilliant nations at the moment. they are in potential impregnable with both their expertise and raw materials working to mutual benefit. in 5, 10 years they would outstrip america and the rest of the west, and be battling with China for tops in the world economically
again it made no sense for Hitler to attack Russia. that had to have been a Jewish project and somehow they got Hitler to buy in