Nuclear War

ketchim · 12-04-2015, 04:34 PM

#1
"Nuclear war would be absolutely unprecedented and ... result in catastrophic destruction,"

"That is why deterrents are so important.

That's why prudence in the field of nuclear matters by leaders all over the world is so essential."


#2
“We have a different view, a very different view from Russia

about what would be constructive for them to do in Syria,”


“That’s not the same as the United States and Russia clashing.”

#3
“Russia’s installation of their anti-aircraft missile-defense system increases that possibility of

-- whether it’s intentional or even an accidental event --

where one side may shoot down the other side’s plane,”

“And that’s really where the potential is for this devastating nuclear war

-- for something that could blow up into something much larger."

#5
Folks ,

would Guyana in South America suffer any effects of a Nuclear "Fall Out"  :-\

#6
Mapoui , whaddabout Tobago  ..

#7
[quote author=ketchim link=topic=101690.msg667498#msg667498 date=1449260260]
Mapoui , whaddabout Tobago  ..

[/quote]

Tobago gyals can come hide in the Guyana jungle!  Tongue

#8
[quote author=ketchim link=topic=101690.msg667490#msg667490 date=1449259007]
Folks ,

would Guyana in South America suffer any effects of a Nuclear "Fall Out"  :-\
[/quote]
Sure. No more reparations, and limited export market for the Guyanese drugs exporters.

#9
Bro , I thinking about going Iwokrama

Y'all can have burning Flesh after Russia drop de Bomb !

#10
The Hiroshima bomb was a primitive 15 kiloton warhead and yet it wiped out a city of 70,000 in a few seconds.

The SS-18 – code named Satan by NATO – carries 10 warheads, each having a yield of 750 to 1000 kiloton.

Some of these missiles carry a single 20,000 kiloton warhead

– that’s 1333 times Hiroshima.


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)