[quote author=Gina145 link=topic=101666.msg667521#msg667521 date=1449271370]
I hope you're right that it's only a blip on the radar.
As for the opening batsmen, I think that Dean Elgar will probably keep his place for the time being as he's done better than some of the other batsmen, so it's more a question of who has partner will be. I don't think that either of his partners during this series are openers at domestic level, so that could be part of the problem. However the selectors like to give a player a few games to prove themselves (hence the fact that Dane Vilas is there ahead of Quinton de Kock), so it's possible that they'll persist with Temba Bavuma.
The middle order is a concern too, and I'm particularly worried about Hashim Amla's form. As I said before, it's possible that the captaincy is hurting his personal performance.
I can't see major changes in the bowling line-up though, but I'm not sure which spinner will play in the home series. And I do expect to see de Kock back behind the stumps.
[/quote]
Firdose Moonda wrote an interesting column today outlining the obstacles South Africa face when it comes to team selection and ensuring that there are at least four players of colour of which one is black African. This was a timely article as it ties in nicely with our recent conversation about who will open the batting for South Africa in the upcoming series against England.
Quote:It makes picking a side difficult because although there are enough players of colour coming through - the franchises have their own transformation requirements of five players of colour with two black Africans, which they are meeting - finding the right players in the right positions is not as simple as colouring by numbers.
Currently, the options available in terms of black African players in the Test are Kagiso Rabada, who played all but one match on the India tour, and Temba Bavuma, who played when Rabada did not. Both had strong showings and demonstrated the success of the transformation plan - it's not about picking players who are not good enough to fill a quota but it about how you decide between players who are good enough. In some countries that decision is made on something as subjective as which player the chief selector or the captain feels has more potential. In South Africa part of that decision is made with transformation guidelines in mind.
At this point it means that when both Philander and Steyn are fit again to play alongside Morkel, Rabada may be left out unless South Africa play four quicks, and there will be no space for Kyle Abbott at all. That will also mean Bavuma will start, but since there is no space for him in his regular spot in the middle order, he will have to open. Luckily for South Africa, Bavuma showed that he could.
He seemed more assured than the man he replaced, van Zyl, but it is not known how he will fare at home on what are bound to be spicy pitches against the England attack. Given that neither van Zyl nor Bavuma is actually an opener, South Africa may want to pick someone more accustomed to the role.
If they do that, their choices are limited to Stephen Cook or Andrew Puttick, and so far, the selectors have said age is the main obstacle to their selection. Cook is 33 and Puttick 34 so the suits have a point, but Cook topped the first-class batting charts last season, Puttick was the fifth-highest run-getter the season before, both average over 40, and between them have played 310 first-class games. That kind of experience should not be scoffed at.
Both Cook and Puttick are white so including one of them would mean re-looking at balance either by making a space for Bavuma lower down, possibly putting JP Duminy's spot at risk, or including Rabada by breaking up the Steyn-Morkel-Philander triumvirate. Whichever way you look at it, it leaves South Africa in a tricky situation and the players know it.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/india-v-sout...49931.html