Dwayne Bravo is no loser.
what on earth makes Brabits a loser ::confused::
look here! an ordinary Trinididad bwoy Dwayne Brabits had one responsibility...to make a secure living fuh himself and whatever family he have.
in doing so he may have had to make him self into a star west indian player... or not. he found a place in T20 that allowed him to carry out his first responsibility in existence..t take care of himself as that is his primary responsiblity
I seem to recall another great west indian who was faced with that same dilemma and fond a way out in the english week end leagues. his name was Learie Constantine.
what did James say: if the west indies could not or refused to take care of their players they do not deserve to keep them. that was 80-85 years ago and the dam problem is still with us. the white planter/commercial domination is gone replaced by a Black bureaucratic parasitic menace.
but the principal relation remains the same..the draconian exploitative..a contradictory relationship between players and admin that will not go away until there is basic social change that kills that contradiction as the major social driver. for that to happen one of the sides of the equation must prevail..workers or owners..eliminating the other in the process
PLAYERS HAVE THE PRIMARY, THEIR FIRST RESPONSIBILITY, AS WE ALL DO..TO TAKE CARE OF OURSELVES FIRST..BEFORE ANY OTHER CONSIDERATION
and all you do ketchim is to beat up on players who look after themselves as best they can, and do not have to rely on the poor quality of wicb efforts in west indies cricket, that observes a disproportionate flow of resources earned by the players flow into wicb pockets.. not into theirs
[size=18pt]absolute traitorous nonsense from a man who denies his own experience and class position in society by denying the players their rights[/size]
what on earth makes Brabits a loser ::confused::
look here! an ordinary Trinididad bwoy Dwayne Brabits had one responsibility...to make a secure living fuh himself and whatever family he have.
in doing so he may have had to make him self into a star west indian player... or not. he found a place in T20 that allowed him to carry out his first responsibility in existence..t take care of himself as that is his primary responsiblity
I seem to recall another great west indian who was faced with that same dilemma and fond a way out in the english week end leagues. his name was Learie Constantine.
what did James say: if the west indies could not or refused to take care of their players they do not deserve to keep them. that was 80-85 years ago and the dam problem is still with us. the white planter/commercial domination is gone replaced by a Black bureaucratic parasitic menace.
but the principal relation remains the same..the draconian exploitative..a contradictory relationship between players and admin that will not go away until there is basic social change that kills that contradiction as the major social driver. for that to happen one of the sides of the equation must prevail..workers or owners..eliminating the other in the process
PLAYERS HAVE THE PRIMARY, THEIR FIRST RESPONSIBILITY, AS WE ALL DO..TO TAKE CARE OF OURSELVES FIRST..BEFORE ANY OTHER CONSIDERATION
and all you do ketchim is to beat up on players who look after themselves as best they can, and do not have to rely on the poor quality of wicb efforts in west indies cricket, that observes a disproportionate flow of resources earned by the players flow into wicb pockets.. not into theirs
[size=18pt]absolute traitorous nonsense from a man who denies his own experience and class position in society by denying the players their rights[/size]
: