Refuse another Sub fielder !

ketchim · 12-19-2014, 11:50 AM · 1 person reading this discussion

#1
Vernon gone off : field with 10 men

This is ludicrous.

Both subs have taken great catches to get rid of our Key bats...

#2
4 bloody subs on the Field of play :

We are playing against 15 men  >Sad

#3
I can see allowing 1 BUT 4  ??????????????

#4
the subs have fresh legs

#5
[size=10pt]play with 11 - 4 absent = 7 + 1 allowable = 8 Fielders [/size]

C'mon Aleem : make the ruling !

#6
Mr Review allowed a bloody sub ..why ????...he already took 5 wickets  >Sad

                                [Image: 201311.3.jpg]

#7
Does anyone know what the record is for most substitute fielders used in an innings? A quick google search came up empty.

#8
The ICC needs to take some action. Allow 2 substitute fielders.

After that you shyte out of luck.

#9
I think a limit is appropriate for the simple reason limitless numbers are subject to abuse!

Why not allow a substitute batsman/ bowler?

#10
[quote author=Mail link=topic=94645.msg606605#msg606605 date=1419024603]
I think a limit is appropriate for the simple reason limitless numbers are subject to abuse!
[/quote]

I think it was abuse that led to the changes regarding when a bowler could bowl after being off the field and where a batsman can bat.

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)