India are shocked that James Anderson has been found not guilty in the Trent Bridge incident involving Ravindra Jadeja, but the case boiled down to one team's word against the other when it became clear crucial video evidence was not available.
First of all there was no Visual evidence and since players were ready to testify against each other,the ICC would have felt this to be a matter reminiscent of squabbling school children.Perhaps if both sides gave up sledging and showed proper courtesy,the remaining 2 matches can get more interesting.
India retaliating in this will do no good for cricket,they have to do it in the next match...
As bala points out, the fact that there was no camera evidence this came down to a he said, he said, handbags at ten paces kerfuffle. Not surprisingly India are unhappy with the verdict and so it will be interesting to see what, if any, fallout happens at the next Test at Old Trafford.
[quote author=The Chairman link=topic=91614.msg578739#msg578739 date=1406945079] India are shocked that James Anderson has been found not guilty in the Trent Bridge incident involving Ravindra Jadeja, but the case boiled down to one team's word against the other when it became clear crucial video evidence was not available.
[/quote] ..and India are not shocked that Jadeja was also found not guilty .......... What's the matter with these people !!!
Cricket is going down a slippery slope with this verdict. No one is contesting that ANderson actually pushed Jadeja. I mean, come on!! It was done in self defense?? Really?? What next? Batsmen throwing punches at the bowler because he had a word to say while crossing over?
