Ajmal seeks explanation for Broad comments

At the same time, why didn't Ajmal and the PCB ignore this as most times the best form of response is none what so ever.

All this is going to do is put the focus on Ajmal. The focus on the buffoon Broad would be nothing significant. He will have his wrists slapped and he will apologise and that's that.

Ajmal damn right and I hope the Pakistani board take it up.

Just watch and see the whining by Anderson and Broad later this summer when they fail to get reverse swing and pester the umpires until they change the ball.

STUPSE

[quote author=bala24 link=topic=89975.msg565163#msg565163 date=1401011299]
If they can bowl a doosra in the match by chucking,they can do it legally in the labs too,but you could easily guess if they are chucking or not.Also,all matches will be scrutinized for any discrepancies and in that way,the bowler can be easily caught for chucking.
[/quote]
I don't get it. What are you trying to say? :/

And the only thing that makes sense is they scrutinze TV footage (which people often say are not relaible and could be deceptive - which I do accept), which is why I asked what's the point of "lab testing" for clearance.

Incidentally - Broad is a prick but I guess that's pretty redundant to say - like water is wet, fire is hot, Sammy sucks, etc. 

If Ajmal does sue Broad, the latter will need another photo of that delivery taken at the point of release. Or Bob Willis as judge.