Some of you may know how strongly I feel about the number of Saffers playing for England.
The main reason is not of where they are born rather where they grew up. Being bought up in a country for a substantial part of your life allows you to absorb key cultural attributes and have the opportunity to experience the education and sporting age groups.
I have often given the example of Trott celebrating with the Saffers mates, when they beat us, 18 months before his debut in the Ashes at The Oval.
There are exceptions like asylum, marriage etc but I felt the same thing about Nash.
He should never have played for the West Indies.
He is playing for Kent and I suspect in the off season he is back in his homeland Australia. Why is he not living and playing for Jamaica as he was so loyal to her, trying to get back his test spot? Although he had a poor run prior to being dropped, I though he could have offered more to the team.
Like Zola Budd using us, Nash did the same.
Thoughts?
The main reason is not of where they are born rather where they grew up. Being bought up in a country for a substantial part of your life allows you to absorb key cultural attributes and have the opportunity to experience the education and sporting age groups.
I have often given the example of Trott celebrating with the Saffers mates, when they beat us, 18 months before his debut in the Ashes at The Oval.
There are exceptions like asylum, marriage etc but I felt the same thing about Nash.
He should never have played for the West Indies.
He is playing for Kent and I suspect in the off season he is back in his homeland Australia. Why is he not living and playing for Jamaica as he was so loyal to her, trying to get back his test spot? Although he had a poor run prior to being dropped, I though he could have offered more to the team.
Like Zola Budd using us, Nash did the same.
Thoughts?