Quote:Oh really MAPPIPPEE,
Do not Psychoanalyse everything FFS.
I am talking about the here and now.
Mappippee I do not wish either of us but especially die with such anger and animosity.
Chill out rasta.
Lord have mercy on you.
You need to do what I did and revert.
is this some sort of attack on me ::confused::
some sort of convoluted play on my mind ::confused::
its like Doosra nailing me on imagination I never used, fooling around with possibilities in what others had said
so what did I say above that warranted such a response from you...where did I express and communicate anger, hate and such like emotion ::confused::
it is getting real hard to speak in these pages without getting attacked for what I did not say, did not mean.
I analysed nutten in anger and hate above. simple..you talking about integrity and you miss the class base of the issue
I thought you meant british etiquette when officials resign when they make faux pas'
but when that happens you note that someone of the same class and interest takes the place of the resigned and nothing changes. the process remains in place. the elite remains in charge.
the elite remains in charge in the west indies too but west indians do not quite follow the english all there. they will not resign. americans also do not resign. canadians tend to resign.
the point is that you accept the underlying process as legit..and when crap takes place a lil resignation will clean it up. thats you!
that is not what I see as required..but basic change, reform of the process or thorough-going revolutionary change.
there will be no resignation in the west indies. so it is either you see the whole story and deal with fully...or keep castigating officials about resignation, who should in fact be arrested and tried for felonious activity.
since no one will investigate, arrest charge and try them..then revolution, intervention by toe people to change everything from the ground up
now do you equate any discussion or analysis at all based on class as anger by any analyst at all..as in need of management.
if so why ::confused:: or is it only me ::confused::
I was and am in no way angry at all...just using my brains in the situation as best I could.
I see everyday in the news journos writing far more in-depth revolutionary assessment of things than I do here. I know these people by career. most are white and well respected. why them 'I am always angry when I write and those others are well respected ::confused::'
is it that I chat nonsense ::confused::
let me know and I will stop