If not Sammy, then who? by Tony Cozier

Beaten and battered in two bruising campaigns, those West Indies players still standing finally stagger home this week with a bag full of questions to be asked and answered over what really went on in India and, especially, New Zealand.

Reports from media conferences on tour were filled with comments that need expansion for new director of cricket, Richard Pybus, and the cricket and executive committees of the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB).

The claim by One-Day International (ODI) captain Dwayne Bravo on arrival in New Zealand that a lack of unity led to the poor performances would be a prominent item in the debriefing.
[url=http://www.nationnews.com/articles/view/if-not-sammy-then-who/]NATION NEWS

A paper clip ??  :-\

so yuh have to register to read starbroek news eh. >

ok!  arrite.  allyuh wait. I go register jess now!

Over the past few years, he fell out with the WICB’s former chief executive Ernest Hilaire

and with coach Gibson.

He claimed that it affected his form; the last of his 87 Tests was in June, 2011.

He is 33, hardly old age for a batsman, and says he’s committed to forcing his way back in with

performance in the coming regional tournaments.

As captain ?  Improbable but not entirely impossible.

I interested in dat Cozier article.  chairman gave no link but is in starbroek but yuh have to register to get the whole thing >

the link is there

[quote author=The Chairman link=topic=86803.msg543501#msg543501 date=1389559298]

NATION NEWS (click)
[/quote]

Maps, Cozier write for Barbados Nation news .The link is above !

tenks..got it

now ambrose and Walsh chime in on Sammy's side.

I swear to god ambrose and Walsh read like ignorant men for all their experience. 

and Crozier is as distasteful ah skunt now as he ever was... for that article above.

don't them fools  see that everything is wrong in west indies cricket at this time.

we have forriner to decide who shud be west indian captain now... that is dead wrong.  so what about the selection committee?

and don't they see that Sammy shud not be in the equation at all...that he is only spoken of because he was forced on to the team as leader, has been there and so now because of that he is a consideration..for what I don't know because he has done nothing to establish himself.

if he is not totally to blame, the blame must still be shared around  the skunt must get his share...not praise but rarse blame.  Sammy should not be part of the discussion at all.

this is like the white people stealing the land in africa... africans take over and leave them with the land.  the captaincy in Sammy's hands is a corruption. there is no merit to it.  so  clean up the corruption by removing him  not so ::confused::

what the hell deh talking about those arse an' dem ::confused::

and when you see Crazier talking like there is no alternative to Sammy, creating a problem where there is none... he is preparing the ground for a shocker.  the situation is so depleted he intimates, that the selectors may be forced take an extraordinary chance on someone least expected

what dat means is allyuh rarse better get ready for Captain Kirk..a bajan..another corrupt leadership choice.

there is a captain...Ramdin.  everybody know that..every body vote fuh Ramdin already.  so what the phuck Crezier talking about 'if not sammy who?'

Crozier  asks " If  not Sammy , then who?" .. Answer is anybody