1st T20I: New Zealand v West Indies

ketchim · 01-10-2014, 12:53 PM · 1 person reading this discussion

#11
Corey out

#12
Pity you folks who stayed up

#13
is holder in the 15 for the T20's ::confused::

if Holder is in that side he must be played before Russell.  Russell is a waste of time.  he is just an ordinary player who is not decisive with bat or ball.

now Holder can be decisive with the ball and contribute really well with the bat.
d of Narine.  Badree and Miller are defensive bowlers.  Bravo threatens no body most times.  the one attacking bowler in the mix is Narine..and mix the Kiwis have neutralized him

it was threadbare attack.  the only player available who could have made that attack into an effective force was Holder.  they did not play him.  that = loss!

#15
good question :Smile

#16
Ravi return to TnT with a broken thumb !

This game was a disaster of shytehounds ....

Kiwis should DEMAND a contest  :-[

#17
Did not see the game but looks like a real mauling.

However can I ask your opinion on the apparent obsession with Fletcher?

15 ODIs average 17.06. Ok he played his last ODI 3 years ago but I have always sensed he is never out of favour with the selectors.

17 T20's average 11.46.

What does he bring that these figures are not telling me?

Of course this question is not related to the defeat.


#18
no no. in the interim he went to the hPC and did well last dung heap.  so another chance.

but Fletcher is only the start. Walton is in the team too.  that is so sweet.  it wud have been better to play one of fletcher and walton and add Holder anyway.

it was idiocy to play both the keepers.  but idiocy is a member of the west indies selection committee

#19
Fletcher , Johnson and Russel does not  belong on any Westindian team.

#20
Quote:Fletcher , Johnson and Russel does not  belong on any Westindian team.

fetching CAKa Walton too >Sad >Sad >Sad

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)