SHIV'S GOALS VS NEW ZEALAND

Rev Al · 12-02-2013, 04:07 PM · 1 person reading this discussion

#71
Bold prediction, Mr. President!  8)

#72
[quote author=Goog Lee link=topic=85722.msg539256#msg539256 date=1387396155]
Bold prediction, Mr. President!  8)
[/quote]

* Shiv has scored 26 hundreds in his last 102 tests---that's a hundred every 3.9 tests----round that off to 4.

* We know Shiv has not scored a hundred in his last 4 tests----2 vs india and 2 vs NZ.

* So right now Shiv is overdue.

* [size=14pt]But if a Shiv hundred means the WI will win or draw and Sammy will remain captain----then the Rev says----let Shiv fail.[/size]

* Time for Sammy to go.

Rev

#73
Sammy not going anywhere, Mr. President!!

he recently made 80...thats good enough for another 5 games. 

Remember now, Sammy is not Guyanese so the higher standards do not apply to him!  Wink

#74
[quote author=Goog Lee link=topic=85722.msg539272#msg539272 date=1387399130]
Sammy not going anywhere, Mr. President!!
he recently made 80...thats good enough for another 5 games. 
Remember now, Sammy is not Guyanese so the higher standards do not apply to him!  Wink
[/quote]

W[size=14pt]ell googs, if Sammy not going anywhere, Shiv may  as well notch up #[/size]

[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQbgmR1X2OqiWaUfIrtIy9...7nmES9WESg]


By the way googs---did you notice how some of the haters over at caribbeancricket.com were celebrating after Shiv scored 1 and 6----those mongrels are dying for Shiv to fail and get dropped-----what a miserable bunch of people----may Shiv continue to mentally torture them.

Rev

#75
To talk a bout an individual's goal in isolation to the team is crass and selfish.

#76
[quote author=easyrider link=topic=85722.msg539298#msg539298 date=1387401694]
To talk a bout an individual's goal in isolation to the team is crass and selfish.
[/quote]

* You are entitled to your opinions and your judgements.

* The Rev is also entitled to his opinions and judgments.

* This thread is about Shiv's goals---if it offends you----you can choose to ignore it.

Rev

#77
[size=18pt]AFTER 2 TESTS:[/size]

Quote:* Shiv is now up to 11,077 runs---he needs 98 runs in the 3rd test to surpass Alan Border(11,174) and become the 6th highest run scorer in tests.

* Shiv has 1 not out in the series thus far---he is now up to 44---same as Border---he needs 2 not outs to share the NOT OUT record with SWaugh.

* Shiv has scored one fifty in the series---he joins Alan Border----both have 90 scores over fifty---Shiv needs one more fifty to surpass Border.

* Shiv now has 895 runs against NZ----he needs 156 runs to surpass Gayle who has scored 1050 runs against NZ.

* Shiv still needs 2 hundreds to become the 11th batsman in history to score 30 test hundreds----Shiv has been struggling in NZ----it doesn't look like he can score a hundred in this series----although he did look like a hundred when he scored that 76 in the first test.

* Maybe Shiv will surprise us all next week and score his 29th test hundred.

Let's see how Shiv does in the 3rd test.

Rev

#78
[quote author=Rev link=topic=85722.msg539304#msg539304 date=1387402541]
* You are entitled to your opinions and your judgements.

* The Rev is also entitled to his opinions and judgments.

* This thread is about Shiv's goals---if it offends you----you can choose to ignore it.

Rev
[/quote]

We are all entitled to opinions but in the scheme of things there is always concensus.

I appreciate you are a Chanderpaul Fanatic and that is neither to be encouraged nor discouraged. It is up to you.

Cricket is played as a team and talking about Chanderpaul's goals, unless he has told you that, seems a bit strange and uncomfortable to me.

I would like to think he is playing for the team and not himself, as you seems convinced.

In fact it is perverse, and would undermine my respect for the man, as you promote Chanderpaul as being selfish.

If he is not, you do much to endorse that view.

#79
easyrider:

* Like I said to you---you are entitled to your opinions and judgments.

* Keep posting.

Rev

#80
Of course I will keep posting.

When one base themselves on empirical evidence, which is absolute, you should have the gumption and fortitude to defend them so do with dignity and grace.

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)