Wicket-keeping is not a dying art: Dujon

krishna · 07-07-2013, 03:24 PM · 2 people reading this discussion

#21
it they way gibson thinks


him and sammy probably did this to spite the TnT cappos

#22
Gilchrist changed how people think about the role of a wicket keeper. He had an average of 47 and a strike rate over 80 in Test cricket. He was also very good with the gloves. He isn't the best wicket keeper in history but he is easily the best wicket keeper/batsman.

#23
[quote author=CHAIRMAN link=topic=81650.msg720660#msg720660 date=1479941395]
Gilchrist changed how people think about the role of a wicket keeper. He had an average of 47 and a strike rate over 80 in Test cricket. He was also very good with the gloves. He isn't the best wicket keeper in history but he is easily the best wicket keeper/batsman.
[/quote]

no sir!ย  there was a south african test by the name of Dennis Lindsay.ย  toย  be best Gilchrist wud have to deal with him.

I dont thing Gilchrist wud comeย  out on top

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)