https://cricketwindies.com/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 08:50:50 +0000 MyBB https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52417.html Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:11:09 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52417.html
Age: 21 years
Hometown: Belle Plaine, Wakenaam, Guyana

Naresh Jagnanan is an outstanding young Guyanese whose remarkable academic journey, leadership, and commitment to excellence have brought honour to Wakenaam, Essequibo, and Guyana. From topping his island at the National Grade Six Assessment to being named Valedictorian at the University of the West Indies (UWI), his achievements reflect years of dedication, discipline, and hard work.

Academic Achievements

Primary Education

* Attended Sans Souci Primary School.
* Topped the island of Wakenaam at the National Grade Six Assessment (NGSA).

Secondary Education — Essequibo Islands Secondary School (EISS)

* Achieved 11 Grade Ones at C-SEC. 
* Recognised as the top Business student in the Caribbean.
* Named Valedictorian of Essequibo Islands Secondary School.

Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Examination (CAPE)

* Achieved an exceptional 14 Grade Ones and 1 Grade Two.
* Named the top overall student in the Caribbean.
* Recognised as the top student in Business Studies in the Caribbean.
* Received the prestigious Presidential Award Scholarship.
* Recognised as Queen's College Top CAPE Student in 2023.

University of the West Indies (UWI)

Throughout his three years at UWI, Naresh continued to demonstrate outstanding academic ability and exemplary leadership.

* Named Valedictorian of the University of the West Indies.
* Reportedly the only regional student selected for this honour, and among the few students to have received this distinction in UWI’s history.
* Served as Chairperson of the International Affairs Committee on the Guild of Students.
* Achieved top results in several courses.
* Earned a place on the Dean’s Honour Roll every semester.
* Received more than five awards recognising his achievements.
* Earned more than ten certificates for leadership, service, and academic excellence throughout his three years at UWI.

A Source of National Pride

Naresh Jagnanan’s journey from Belle Plaine, Wakenaam, to the highest levels of academic recognition at UWI is a testament to the power of ambition, perseverance, and excellence.

At just 21 years old, he has distinguished himself at the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels, excelling not only in academics but also in leadership and service.

Naresh’s achievements are a source of immense pride for Wakenaam, Essequibo, and Guyana. His story reminds us that talent and determination can take a young person from a small community to the highest stages of regional academic recognition.

Congratulations, Naresh Jagnanan! Guyana celebrates your excellence, your leadership, and your extraordinary accomplishments.]]>
Age: 21 years
Hometown: Belle Plaine, Wakenaam, Guyana

Naresh Jagnanan is an outstanding young Guyanese whose remarkable academic journey, leadership, and commitment to excellence have brought honour to Wakenaam, Essequibo, and Guyana. From topping his island at the National Grade Six Assessment to being named Valedictorian at the University of the West Indies (UWI), his achievements reflect years of dedication, discipline, and hard work.

Academic Achievements

Primary Education

* Attended Sans Souci Primary School.
* Topped the island of Wakenaam at the National Grade Six Assessment (NGSA).

Secondary Education — Essequibo Islands Secondary School (EISS)

* Achieved 11 Grade Ones at C-SEC. 
* Recognised as the top Business student in the Caribbean.
* Named Valedictorian of Essequibo Islands Secondary School.

Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Examination (CAPE)

* Achieved an exceptional 14 Grade Ones and 1 Grade Two.
* Named the top overall student in the Caribbean.
* Recognised as the top student in Business Studies in the Caribbean.
* Received the prestigious Presidential Award Scholarship.
* Recognised as Queen's College Top CAPE Student in 2023.

University of the West Indies (UWI)

Throughout his three years at UWI, Naresh continued to demonstrate outstanding academic ability and exemplary leadership.

* Named Valedictorian of the University of the West Indies.
* Reportedly the only regional student selected for this honour, and among the few students to have received this distinction in UWI’s history.
* Served as Chairperson of the International Affairs Committee on the Guild of Students.
* Achieved top results in several courses.
* Earned a place on the Dean’s Honour Roll every semester.
* Received more than five awards recognising his achievements.
* Earned more than ten certificates for leadership, service, and academic excellence throughout his three years at UWI.

A Source of National Pride

Naresh Jagnanan’s journey from Belle Plaine, Wakenaam, to the highest levels of academic recognition at UWI is a testament to the power of ambition, perseverance, and excellence.

At just 21 years old, he has distinguished himself at the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels, excelling not only in academics but also in leadership and service.

Naresh’s achievements are a source of immense pride for Wakenaam, Essequibo, and Guyana. His story reminds us that talent and determination can take a young person from a small community to the highest stages of regional academic recognition.

Congratulations, Naresh Jagnanan! Guyana celebrates your excellence, your leadership, and your extraordinary accomplishments.]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52416.html Wed, 21 Oct 2026 15:43:22 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52416.html
• Resists lawful orders… Jail
• Block a road… jail!
• Flee arrest… jail!
• Mob a car… Get Run Over!
• Spit or hit us… Your’e going to the Hospital, then jail!

“If you throw a brick, a firebomb, or point a gun at one of our deputies, we will notify your families where to collect your remains, because we will kill you graveyard dead.”]]>
• Resists lawful orders… Jail
• Block a road… jail!
• Flee arrest… jail!
• Mob a car… Get Run Over!
• Spit or hit us… Your’e going to the Hospital, then jail!

“If you throw a brick, a firebomb, or point a gun at one of our deputies, we will notify your families where to collect your remains, because we will kill you graveyard dead.”]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52410.html Wed, 21 Oct 2026 00:06:52 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52410.html Why does society celebrate a wedding but sometimes condemn the very people whose marriages did not survive?

There is something deeply troubling about the way society treats divorced people.
We celebrate weddings with beautiful decorations, grand receptions, expensive gifts, photographs, prayers and promises of forever. We applaud couples as they begin their journey together, wishing them love, happiness and a lifetime of togetherness.
Yet, when that marriage comes to an end, the same society that once celebrated the union can become the very society that judges, whispers, points fingers and attaches shame to the people involved.
Suddenly, the divorced woman becomes a topic of discussion. The divorced man becomes a subject of speculation. Their private struggles become public entertainment, and their personal decisions become everybody else's business.
But why?
When did divorce become a stain on a person's character? When did the end of a marriage become the end of someone's dignity?

My honest opinion is that divorce should not automatically be viewed as a failure, a disgrace or a reason for discrimination. I believe that when a couple is no longer happy, when the relationship has become abusive, or when both individuals mutually agree that their marriage has run its course, they should be allowed to separate with dignity and without being condemned by society.
Marriage is a commitment, yes. It requires patience, sacrifice, understanding, forgiveness and effort from both partners. It should never be treated as something disposable whenever challenges arise. However, commitment should not mean that a person must sacrifice their peace, safety, emotional well-being or entire identity to maintain the appearance of a successful marriage.
There is a difference between fighting for a marriage and losing yourself trying to save one.
We must understand that not every marriage ends because someone was unfaithful, irresponsible or unwilling to make an effort. Sometimes, two people genuinely try, but their differences become irreconcilable. Sometimes, love fades. Sometimes, people grow in different directions. Sometimes, the home that was supposed to be a place of comfort becomes a place of fear, humiliation, control or constant conflict.
And sometimes, two mature individuals simply recognise that they are no longer right for each other and choose to part ways peacefully.
Why should any of these circumstances automatically make them bad people?
The double standards are real
One of the most painful aspects of divorce is the unequal treatment people often receive afterwards.
A divorced woman may be labelled as damaged goods, desperate, troublesome or incapable of maintaining a relationship. Some people begin to question her morals, her character and even her suitability as a mother. Others assume that because she is single, she must be interested in someone's husband or that she poses a threat to other women.
A divorced man may be accused of being irresponsible, unfaithful or incapable of commitment, even when nobody knows the truth about what happened in his home.
And what is even more disturbing is that people often make these judgments without knowing the circumstances that led to the separation.
They do not know the tears that were shed behind closed doors. They do not know the nights someone spent feeling lonely while lying beside their spouse. They do not know the countless attempts to repair the relationship, the prayers offered, the counselling sought or the pain endured in silence.
Yet, they feel entitled to deliver a verdict.
We cannot claim to value kindness, fairness and human dignity while treating people as though their marital status determines their worth.
A marriage certificate is not a certificate of good character, and a divorce certificate is not proof of bad character.
The stigma can be more painful than the separation itself
For some people, the end of a marriage is already an emotionally difficult experience. They may be grieving the loss of a relationship, adjusting to a new home, rebuilding financially, navigating co-parenting arrangements or trying to rediscover who they are outside the identity of being someone's husband or wife.
Instead of receiving understanding and support, they are sometimes met with gossip, exclusion, ridicule and unsolicited advice.
Some are no longer invited to certain gatherings. Some lose friendships because people feel compelled to choose sides. Some are treated differently at religious or community events. Others become afraid to pursue new relationships because they fear being judged for having a failed marriage.
This stigma can make people feel that they must defend their decisions repeatedly, as though they owe the world an explanation for choosing a different path.
Research on divorce stigma has documented how divorced people can experience social exclusion, blame and a sense of being devalued. The consequences are not merely imaginary; the way society responds can affect a person's social relationships and sense of belonging.
But here is the question we must ask ourselves: Why are we adding suffering to someone who may already be trying to heal?
If we cannot repair their marriage, must we also damage their peace?
If we cannot understand their circumstances, must we condemn them?
If we cannot offer support, must we make their journey more difficult?
Staying married is not always the same as being happy
We must be careful not to romanticise the idea of remaining married at all costs.
There are people who stay in unhappy marriages because they fear public humiliation. There are those who endure emotional, verbal, physical or other forms of abuse because they are terrified of being called divorced. Some remain in relationships where they are no longer loved, respected or valued because they worry about what their families, communities or religious circles will say.
They continue to smile for photographs, attend functions as a couple and present a picture of happiness to the outside world while privately struggling to survive emotionally.
Is that truly what we want for people?
Should someone be expected to endure abuse just to preserve a reputation?
Should a person remain miserable for decades because society considers divorce embarrassing?
Should the opinions of neighbours, relatives and friends carry more weight than a person's safety and well-being?
I believe the answer is no.
Marriage deserves respect, but so does the individual within that marriage. Where abuse exists, safety must come first. No one should be pressured to remain in danger to satisfy society's expectations.
And where two people mutually agree that they are happier apart, we should respect their decision without turning their lives into a public trial.
What about the children?
One of the most common arguments against divorce is that it affects children. Certainly, separation can be difficult for children, and their emotional needs must always be taken seriously.
But we must also acknowledge that children can be affected by growing up in a home filled with hostility, fear, disrespect and constant conflict.
The goal should not simply be to keep two parents under the same roof at any cost. The goal should be to create a safe, stable and loving environment in which children can thrive.
Where possible, parents should work together to protect their children from conflict, avoid using them as messengers or weapons, and continue to provide love, guidance and support.
Divorce ends a marriage; it does not have to end responsible parenting.
A divorced mother can be an exceptional mother. A divorced father can be a devoted father. A child from a divorced home can grow up surrounded by love, security and positive values.
We must stop assuming that a family is only respectable when its parents remain married.
A person's past should not determine their future
Perhaps one of the cruelest aspects of the stigma surrounding divorce is the suggestion that a divorced person is somehow less deserving of love.
Why should someone be denied the opportunity to find happiness again because a previous relationship did not work?
Why should a person's marital history become a permanent mark against them?
People learn. People grow. People make mistakes, recognise incompatibility, recover from painful experiences and begin again.
A divorced person may enter a future relationship with greater self-awareness, clearer boundaries, a better understanding of their needs and a deeper appreciation for mutual respect.
Of course, divorce does not automatically make someone wiser or more mature, just as marriage does not automatically make someone a good partner. What matters is a person's character, conduct, values and willingness to grow.
We should judge people by how they treat others, not merely by whether they have been married before.
And let us not forget that people who are currently married may also be experiencing difficulties. Their marital status does not reveal the full truth about their happiness, faithfulness or character.
A wedding ring cannot tell us everything about a person's life. Neither can a divorce certificate.
Let us stop turning private pain into public shame
I believe we need a more compassionate conversation about divorce, particularly in communities where family reputation, tradition and public opinion carry enormous weight.
We must teach our children that marriage is valuable, but that no person should be humiliated because a marriage ends.
We must encourage couples to seek counselling, communicate honestly and make every reasonable effort to resolve their differences when it is safe and appropriate to do so. But we must also recognise that reconciliation is not always possible, and separation is sometimes the healthiest or safest decision.
We must stop asking divorced people embarrassing questions about their private lives. We must stop spreading rumours about who was responsible. We must stop assuming that the person who initiated the divorce was necessarily the one at fault.
And, most importantly, we must stop treating divorced women and men as though they have lost their social value.
They are still someone's son or daughter, mother or father, brother or sister, friend, colleague and neighbour. They still deserve invitations, respect, companionship, opportunities and the freedom to live without being constantly reminded of their marital history.
Their lives did not end when their marriages ended.
Their dignity did not disappear.
Their worth was never dependent on their relationship status.
My final thoughts
I respect marriage. I believe in love, commitment, loyalty, patience and working through difficulties. I believe that couples should not abandon their marriages at the first sign of trouble.
But I also believe in personal dignity, emotional well-being, safety and the freedom to make difficult decisions about one's own life.
We must learn to distinguish between a failed marriage and a failed person. They are not the same thing.
Sometimes a marriage ends despite the best efforts of those involved. Sometimes it ends because one or both partners have caused harm. Sometimes it ends because the people involved recognise that continuing together is no longer right for them.
Whatever the circumstances, we should be cautious about passing judgment when we have not lived their lives or carried their burdens.
Let us celebrate people who build loving marriages, but let us also show compassion to those whose marriages have ended.
Let us encourage reconciliation where it is healthy and safe, but let us never shame someone for leaving an abusive or deeply unhappy relationship.
Let us stop attaching a stain to divorce and start recognising the humanity of the people behind the decision.
Because at the end of the day, a person's worth is not measured by how long they remain married, but by their character, their values, their actions and the way they treat others.
Divorced people are not broken goods. They are not failures. They are not a disgrace to their families or a stain on society.
They are human beings who, like everyone else, deserve the opportunity to heal, to grow, to love and to live again.
Marriage deserves respect. Divorce deserves understanding. And every human being deserves dignity.
Let us stop asking, “Why couldn't you keep your marriage?”
And start asking, “How can we treat one another with more compassion, regardless of what life has brought our way?”
Because no one should have to carry the burden of a broken relationship and the burden of society's condemnation at the same time.
Divorced, not disgraced. Separated, not worthless. Single again, not less deserving. And always, human first.]]> Why does society celebrate a wedding but sometimes condemn the very people whose marriages did not survive?

There is something deeply troubling about the way society treats divorced people.
We celebrate weddings with beautiful decorations, grand receptions, expensive gifts, photographs, prayers and promises of forever. We applaud couples as they begin their journey together, wishing them love, happiness and a lifetime of togetherness.
Yet, when that marriage comes to an end, the same society that once celebrated the union can become the very society that judges, whispers, points fingers and attaches shame to the people involved.
Suddenly, the divorced woman becomes a topic of discussion. The divorced man becomes a subject of speculation. Their private struggles become public entertainment, and their personal decisions become everybody else's business.
But why?
When did divorce become a stain on a person's character? When did the end of a marriage become the end of someone's dignity?

My honest opinion is that divorce should not automatically be viewed as a failure, a disgrace or a reason for discrimination. I believe that when a couple is no longer happy, when the relationship has become abusive, or when both individuals mutually agree that their marriage has run its course, they should be allowed to separate with dignity and without being condemned by society.
Marriage is a commitment, yes. It requires patience, sacrifice, understanding, forgiveness and effort from both partners. It should never be treated as something disposable whenever challenges arise. However, commitment should not mean that a person must sacrifice their peace, safety, emotional well-being or entire identity to maintain the appearance of a successful marriage.
There is a difference between fighting for a marriage and losing yourself trying to save one.
We must understand that not every marriage ends because someone was unfaithful, irresponsible or unwilling to make an effort. Sometimes, two people genuinely try, but their differences become irreconcilable. Sometimes, love fades. Sometimes, people grow in different directions. Sometimes, the home that was supposed to be a place of comfort becomes a place of fear, humiliation, control or constant conflict.
And sometimes, two mature individuals simply recognise that they are no longer right for each other and choose to part ways peacefully.
Why should any of these circumstances automatically make them bad people?
The double standards are real
One of the most painful aspects of divorce is the unequal treatment people often receive afterwards.
A divorced woman may be labelled as damaged goods, desperate, troublesome or incapable of maintaining a relationship. Some people begin to question her morals, her character and even her suitability as a mother. Others assume that because she is single, she must be interested in someone's husband or that she poses a threat to other women.
A divorced man may be accused of being irresponsible, unfaithful or incapable of commitment, even when nobody knows the truth about what happened in his home.
And what is even more disturbing is that people often make these judgments without knowing the circumstances that led to the separation.
They do not know the tears that were shed behind closed doors. They do not know the nights someone spent feeling lonely while lying beside their spouse. They do not know the countless attempts to repair the relationship, the prayers offered, the counselling sought or the pain endured in silence.
Yet, they feel entitled to deliver a verdict.
We cannot claim to value kindness, fairness and human dignity while treating people as though their marital status determines their worth.
A marriage certificate is not a certificate of good character, and a divorce certificate is not proof of bad character.
The stigma can be more painful than the separation itself
For some people, the end of a marriage is already an emotionally difficult experience. They may be grieving the loss of a relationship, adjusting to a new home, rebuilding financially, navigating co-parenting arrangements or trying to rediscover who they are outside the identity of being someone's husband or wife.
Instead of receiving understanding and support, they are sometimes met with gossip, exclusion, ridicule and unsolicited advice.
Some are no longer invited to certain gatherings. Some lose friendships because people feel compelled to choose sides. Some are treated differently at religious or community events. Others become afraid to pursue new relationships because they fear being judged for having a failed marriage.
This stigma can make people feel that they must defend their decisions repeatedly, as though they owe the world an explanation for choosing a different path.
Research on divorce stigma has documented how divorced people can experience social exclusion, blame and a sense of being devalued. The consequences are not merely imaginary; the way society responds can affect a person's social relationships and sense of belonging.
But here is the question we must ask ourselves: Why are we adding suffering to someone who may already be trying to heal?
If we cannot repair their marriage, must we also damage their peace?
If we cannot understand their circumstances, must we condemn them?
If we cannot offer support, must we make their journey more difficult?
Staying married is not always the same as being happy
We must be careful not to romanticise the idea of remaining married at all costs.
There are people who stay in unhappy marriages because they fear public humiliation. There are those who endure emotional, verbal, physical or other forms of abuse because they are terrified of being called divorced. Some remain in relationships where they are no longer loved, respected or valued because they worry about what their families, communities or religious circles will say.
They continue to smile for photographs, attend functions as a couple and present a picture of happiness to the outside world while privately struggling to survive emotionally.
Is that truly what we want for people?
Should someone be expected to endure abuse just to preserve a reputation?
Should a person remain miserable for decades because society considers divorce embarrassing?
Should the opinions of neighbours, relatives and friends carry more weight than a person's safety and well-being?
I believe the answer is no.
Marriage deserves respect, but so does the individual within that marriage. Where abuse exists, safety must come first. No one should be pressured to remain in danger to satisfy society's expectations.
And where two people mutually agree that they are happier apart, we should respect their decision without turning their lives into a public trial.
What about the children?
One of the most common arguments against divorce is that it affects children. Certainly, separation can be difficult for children, and their emotional needs must always be taken seriously.
But we must also acknowledge that children can be affected by growing up in a home filled with hostility, fear, disrespect and constant conflict.
The goal should not simply be to keep two parents under the same roof at any cost. The goal should be to create a safe, stable and loving environment in which children can thrive.
Where possible, parents should work together to protect their children from conflict, avoid using them as messengers or weapons, and continue to provide love, guidance and support.
Divorce ends a marriage; it does not have to end responsible parenting.
A divorced mother can be an exceptional mother. A divorced father can be a devoted father. A child from a divorced home can grow up surrounded by love, security and positive values.
We must stop assuming that a family is only respectable when its parents remain married.
A person's past should not determine their future
Perhaps one of the cruelest aspects of the stigma surrounding divorce is the suggestion that a divorced person is somehow less deserving of love.
Why should someone be denied the opportunity to find happiness again because a previous relationship did not work?
Why should a person's marital history become a permanent mark against them?
People learn. People grow. People make mistakes, recognise incompatibility, recover from painful experiences and begin again.
A divorced person may enter a future relationship with greater self-awareness, clearer boundaries, a better understanding of their needs and a deeper appreciation for mutual respect.
Of course, divorce does not automatically make someone wiser or more mature, just as marriage does not automatically make someone a good partner. What matters is a person's character, conduct, values and willingness to grow.
We should judge people by how they treat others, not merely by whether they have been married before.
And let us not forget that people who are currently married may also be experiencing difficulties. Their marital status does not reveal the full truth about their happiness, faithfulness or character.
A wedding ring cannot tell us everything about a person's life. Neither can a divorce certificate.
Let us stop turning private pain into public shame
I believe we need a more compassionate conversation about divorce, particularly in communities where family reputation, tradition and public opinion carry enormous weight.
We must teach our children that marriage is valuable, but that no person should be humiliated because a marriage ends.
We must encourage couples to seek counselling, communicate honestly and make every reasonable effort to resolve their differences when it is safe and appropriate to do so. But we must also recognise that reconciliation is not always possible, and separation is sometimes the healthiest or safest decision.
We must stop asking divorced people embarrassing questions about their private lives. We must stop spreading rumours about who was responsible. We must stop assuming that the person who initiated the divorce was necessarily the one at fault.
And, most importantly, we must stop treating divorced women and men as though they have lost their social value.
They are still someone's son or daughter, mother or father, brother or sister, friend, colleague and neighbour. They still deserve invitations, respect, companionship, opportunities and the freedom to live without being constantly reminded of their marital history.
Their lives did not end when their marriages ended.
Their dignity did not disappear.
Their worth was never dependent on their relationship status.
My final thoughts
I respect marriage. I believe in love, commitment, loyalty, patience and working through difficulties. I believe that couples should not abandon their marriages at the first sign of trouble.
But I also believe in personal dignity, emotional well-being, safety and the freedom to make difficult decisions about one's own life.
We must learn to distinguish between a failed marriage and a failed person. They are not the same thing.
Sometimes a marriage ends despite the best efforts of those involved. Sometimes it ends because one or both partners have caused harm. Sometimes it ends because the people involved recognise that continuing together is no longer right for them.
Whatever the circumstances, we should be cautious about passing judgment when we have not lived their lives or carried their burdens.
Let us celebrate people who build loving marriages, but let us also show compassion to those whose marriages have ended.
Let us encourage reconciliation where it is healthy and safe, but let us never shame someone for leaving an abusive or deeply unhappy relationship.
Let us stop attaching a stain to divorce and start recognising the humanity of the people behind the decision.
Because at the end of the day, a person's worth is not measured by how long they remain married, but by their character, their values, their actions and the way they treat others.
Divorced people are not broken goods. They are not failures. They are not a disgrace to their families or a stain on society.
They are human beings who, like everyone else, deserve the opportunity to heal, to grow, to love and to live again.
Marriage deserves respect. Divorce deserves understanding. And every human being deserves dignity.
Let us stop asking, “Why couldn't you keep your marriage?”
And start asking, “How can we treat one another with more compassion, regardless of what life has brought our way?”
Because no one should have to carry the burden of a broken relationship and the burden of society's condemnation at the same time.
Divorced, not disgraced. Separated, not worthless. Single again, not less deserving. And always, human first.]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52401.html Sat, 17 Oct 2026 17:47:51 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52401.html
Marco served the Party in various capacities and stood alongside Dr. Cheddi Jagan in the struggle to restore democracy in Guyana. For his political activism, he endured brutality and repeated imprisonment. He later served as a Member of Parliament, continuing his commitment to the Party and the country.

I join all those who knew and admired him in mourning his passing, and I hope his family finds strength and comfort during this difficult time.

May his soul rest in peace.

---

I am deeply saddened at the passing of Cde Joseph ‘Marco’ De Souza, an outstanding son of Region One, a dedicated comrade, a true patriot, a committed nationalist and a fearless defender of democracy.

A stalwart of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) and former Member of Parliament, Cde Marco stood alongside Dr. Cheddi Jagan during the dark days of dictatorship. He endured brutality, persecution and repeated imprisonment in the struggle for the restoration of democracy, never wavering in his convictions or commitment to the cause.

A steadfast PPP activist in Santa Rosa and throughout Region One, he served the party in various capacities, contributing significantly to its political struggles and the advancement of the region.

His commitment to Barima-Waini extended beyond politics. He remained deeply connected to its communities and their aspirations, consistently championing their development and well-being.

His sacrifices in the struggle for democracy and his decades of service have secured him an honoured place in the history of Region One and our country.

On behalf of the Government and people of Guyana, and on my own behalf, I extend heartfelt condolences to his family, friends, political comrades and the people of Barima-Waini.

May they find comfort in the knowledge that his was a life of conviction, sacrifice and selfless service.

May his soul rest in eternal peace.]]>
Marco served the Party in various capacities and stood alongside Dr. Cheddi Jagan in the struggle to restore democracy in Guyana. For his political activism, he endured brutality and repeated imprisonment. He later served as a Member of Parliament, continuing his commitment to the Party and the country.

I join all those who knew and admired him in mourning his passing, and I hope his family finds strength and comfort during this difficult time.

May his soul rest in peace.

---

I am deeply saddened at the passing of Cde Joseph ‘Marco’ De Souza, an outstanding son of Region One, a dedicated comrade, a true patriot, a committed nationalist and a fearless defender of democracy.

A stalwart of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) and former Member of Parliament, Cde Marco stood alongside Dr. Cheddi Jagan during the dark days of dictatorship. He endured brutality, persecution and repeated imprisonment in the struggle for the restoration of democracy, never wavering in his convictions or commitment to the cause.

A steadfast PPP activist in Santa Rosa and throughout Region One, he served the party in various capacities, contributing significantly to its political struggles and the advancement of the region.

His commitment to Barima-Waini extended beyond politics. He remained deeply connected to its communities and their aspirations, consistently championing their development and well-being.

His sacrifices in the struggle for democracy and his decades of service have secured him an honoured place in the history of Region One and our country.

On behalf of the Government and people of Guyana, and on my own behalf, I extend heartfelt condolences to his family, friends, political comrades and the people of Barima-Waini.

May they find comfort in the knowledge that his was a life of conviction, sacrifice and selfless service.

May his soul rest in eternal peace.]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52377.html Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:41:50 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52377.html
The local motor-racing fraternity has been plunged into mourning following the passing of motorsport legend, stalwart and pioneer Errol Tenpow.

Errol’s family members confirmed his passing this morning.

The Guyana Motor Racing and Sports Club (GMR&SC), in a statement, expressed condolences to the family and those affected by Tenpow’s passing.

“His passion for motorsport, unwavering dedication, and lifelong support helped shape the racing community we proudly celebrate today. More than a pioneer, he was a mentor, an inspiration, and a treasured part of our motorsport family,” the GMR&SC said.

The club added that Errol’s “legacy will continue to live on in the hearts of those he inspired and in the sport to which he dedicated so much of his life.”

“Our thoughts and prayers are with his family, friends, and loved ones during this difficult time. Rest in peace, Errol Tenpow. Your contributions to Guyana’s motorsport will never be forgotten.”]]>
The local motor-racing fraternity has been plunged into mourning following the passing of motorsport legend, stalwart and pioneer Errol Tenpow.

Errol’s family members confirmed his passing this morning.

The Guyana Motor Racing and Sports Club (GMR&SC), in a statement, expressed condolences to the family and those affected by Tenpow’s passing.

“His passion for motorsport, unwavering dedication, and lifelong support helped shape the racing community we proudly celebrate today. More than a pioneer, he was a mentor, an inspiration, and a treasured part of our motorsport family,” the GMR&SC said.

The club added that Errol’s “legacy will continue to live on in the hearts of those he inspired and in the sport to which he dedicated so much of his life.”

“Our thoughts and prayers are with his family, friends, and loved ones during this difficult time. Rest in peace, Errol Tenpow. Your contributions to Guyana’s motorsport will never be forgotten.”]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52359.html Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:09:20 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52359.html
The spokesperson said Mitte died Monday, and that it’s an ongoing investigation.

A person who answered the phone at Formation Talent, the office of Mitte’s most recent manager Matt Gogal, said they had no comment at this time.

His representatives confirmed his passing in a statement to Deadline, writing, “It is with profound sadness that we share the tragic passing of beloved actor, philanthropist, and passionate disability rights advocate RJ Mitte.”]]>
The spokesperson said Mitte died Monday, and that it’s an ongoing investigation.

A person who answered the phone at Formation Talent, the office of Mitte’s most recent manager Matt Gogal, said they had no comment at this time.

His representatives confirmed his passing in a statement to Deadline, writing, “It is with profound sadness that we share the tragic passing of beloved actor, philanthropist, and passionate disability rights advocate RJ Mitte.”]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52356.html Sat, 10 Oct 2026 22:40:46 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52356.html
Veteran Guyanese politician and historian Eusi Kwayana has died at the age of 101, his passing confirmed to NCN News by Working People’s Alliance (WPA) Co-Leader Dr David Hinds.

Dr Hinds said he received confirmation of Kwayana’s death from his family, which is expected to issue an official statement. He added that the WPA will also release a statement on the passing of one of its most prominent founding figures.

Kwayana, born Sydney Evanson King on April 4, 1925, was a respected political activist, educator and writer whose contributions to Guyana’s political development spanned more than eight decades.

He was an early member of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP), serving as Assistant General Secretary and Minister of Communications and Works in the short-lived PPP government of 1953, before the British suspended the constitution.

Following the political divisions of the 1950s, Kwayana eventually joined the People’s National Congress (PNC) under Forbes Burnham before later becoming a leading figure in the WPA, where he worked closely with the late Dr Walter Rodney.

He was also instrumental in establishing the African Society for Cultural Relations with Independent Africa (ASCRIA) and remained an outspoken advocate for democracy, racial equality, social justice and national unity.

Meanwhile, the People’s National Congress Reform (PNCR) and A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) have expressed deep sorrow over his passing, describing him as a patriot, historian and towering figure in Guyana’s political and social development.

In a statement, the parties said Kwayana dedicated his life to the struggles and aspirations of the Guyanese people, contributing significantly to the country’s independence movement and political evolution.

They also highlighted his contributions as a historian and writer, noting that his work helped preserve Guyana’s history for future generations.

NCN News]]>
Veteran Guyanese politician and historian Eusi Kwayana has died at the age of 101, his passing confirmed to NCN News by Working People’s Alliance (WPA) Co-Leader Dr David Hinds.

Dr Hinds said he received confirmation of Kwayana’s death from his family, which is expected to issue an official statement. He added that the WPA will also release a statement on the passing of one of its most prominent founding figures.

Kwayana, born Sydney Evanson King on April 4, 1925, was a respected political activist, educator and writer whose contributions to Guyana’s political development spanned more than eight decades.

He was an early member of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP), serving as Assistant General Secretary and Minister of Communications and Works in the short-lived PPP government of 1953, before the British suspended the constitution.

Following the political divisions of the 1950s, Kwayana eventually joined the People’s National Congress (PNC) under Forbes Burnham before later becoming a leading figure in the WPA, where he worked closely with the late Dr Walter Rodney.

He was also instrumental in establishing the African Society for Cultural Relations with Independent Africa (ASCRIA) and remained an outspoken advocate for democracy, racial equality, social justice and national unity.

Meanwhile, the People’s National Congress Reform (PNCR) and A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) have expressed deep sorrow over his passing, describing him as a patriot, historian and towering figure in Guyana’s political and social development.

In a statement, the parties said Kwayana dedicated his life to the struggles and aspirations of the Guyanese people, contributing significantly to the country’s independence movement and political evolution.

They also highlighted his contributions as a historian and writer, noting that his work helped preserve Guyana’s history for future generations.

NCN News]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52355.html Sat, 10 Oct 2026 16:48:32 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52355.html
At home, her grandparents toiled in Natal's sugarcane fields under British indenture. At the University of Natal, a lecturer failed her assignment for rejecting the claim that Britain had "civilised" India. 

In 1967, Pillay opened her Durban law practice and went on to challenge apartheid police torture, exposing abuses against political detainees and winning a historic 1973 court ruling against unlawful solitary confinement on Robben Island.  

Apartheid authorities watched her, branded her dangerous and denied her a passport. Yet on 31 January 1995, the woman once barred from judges' chambers entered her own as the first non-white woman to serve on South Africa's Supreme Court. 

At the Rwanda tribunal, she exposed the systematic rape of Tutsi women, helping secure the landmark 2 September 1998 judgment recognising rape as an act of genocide. 

She became the first African UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in 2008, then chaired the commission that concluded in September 2025 that Israel had committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. 

On 9 October 2026, the schoolgirl who condemned Vasco da Gama's imperialism won the Nobel Peace Prize. 

Navanethem "Navi" Pillay has spent her life confronting colonialism, white supremacy and genocide.]]>
At home, her grandparents toiled in Natal's sugarcane fields under British indenture. At the University of Natal, a lecturer failed her assignment for rejecting the claim that Britain had "civilised" India. 

In 1967, Pillay opened her Durban law practice and went on to challenge apartheid police torture, exposing abuses against political detainees and winning a historic 1973 court ruling against unlawful solitary confinement on Robben Island.  

Apartheid authorities watched her, branded her dangerous and denied her a passport. Yet on 31 January 1995, the woman once barred from judges' chambers entered her own as the first non-white woman to serve on South Africa's Supreme Court. 

At the Rwanda tribunal, she exposed the systematic rape of Tutsi women, helping secure the landmark 2 September 1998 judgment recognising rape as an act of genocide. 

She became the first African UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in 2008, then chaired the commission that concluded in September 2025 that Israel had committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. 

On 9 October 2026, the schoolgirl who condemned Vasco da Gama's imperialism won the Nobel Peace Prize. 

Navanethem "Navi" Pillay has spent her life confronting colonialism, white supremacy and genocide.]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52352.html Fri, 09 Oct 2026 12:38:51 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52352.html Lemme ask y’all Guyanese who living outside of Guyana legally or hiding pon ICE, something:
If Guyana is truly in her “golden era of development” with the “fastest growing economy in the world” then why don’t y’all move back here?

Come home to:
?? The land of daily nationwide blackouts compliments of GPL
?? Rusty and low water pressure.
?? Public transportation that can sometimes feel hazardous to your health, with fares that seem to have no ceiling.
?? Internet outages from Wi-Fi to mobile services.
?? Concerns about crime and a justice system that jails you for weed and let murderers walk free
?? University graduates struggling to find suitable employment.
?? Roads that are built today and breaking up tomorrow.
?? Contracts being handed to people who never held a hammer in their life.
?? Overcrowded public hospitals and long waiting times for some services.
?? Poor drainage and flooding after heavy rainfall, especially in low-lying communities.
?? Garbage collection problems and illegal dumping in some areas.

And that’s just the beginning. The list is long.

Ironically, some of the same people celebrating Guyana’s supposed transformation from thousands of miles away are people who once left because of many of these very problems. So I dare all y’all in America both those with legal status and those with expired visas with keyboard courage to put your money where your patriotic mouth is.

Come back home and live here!??
Come experience this “golden era” firsthand.
Because it’s easy to celebrate development from the comfort of another country and cuss and fight people on Facebook who disagree because we are living here. It’s another thing entirely to live through the realities of the country you’re celebrating and I can bet my last dollar you’d move and fly back instantly!

Signed, 
A fed up Guyanese. ?‍?]]> Lemme ask y’all Guyanese who living outside of Guyana legally or hiding pon ICE, something:
If Guyana is truly in her “golden era of development” with the “fastest growing economy in the world” then why don’t y’all move back here?

Come home to:
?? The land of daily nationwide blackouts compliments of GPL
?? Rusty and low water pressure.
?? Public transportation that can sometimes feel hazardous to your health, with fares that seem to have no ceiling.
?? Internet outages from Wi-Fi to mobile services.
?? Concerns about crime and a justice system that jails you for weed and let murderers walk free
?? University graduates struggling to find suitable employment.
?? Roads that are built today and breaking up tomorrow.
?? Contracts being handed to people who never held a hammer in their life.
?? Overcrowded public hospitals and long waiting times for some services.
?? Poor drainage and flooding after heavy rainfall, especially in low-lying communities.
?? Garbage collection problems and illegal dumping in some areas.

And that’s just the beginning. The list is long.

Ironically, some of the same people celebrating Guyana’s supposed transformation from thousands of miles away are people who once left because of many of these very problems. So I dare all y’all in America both those with legal status and those with expired visas with keyboard courage to put your money where your patriotic mouth is.

Come back home and live here!??
Come experience this “golden era” firsthand.
Because it’s easy to celebrate development from the comfort of another country and cuss and fight people on Facebook who disagree because we are living here. It’s another thing entirely to live through the realities of the country you’re celebrating and I can bet my last dollar you’d move and fly back instantly!

Signed, 
A fed up Guyanese. ?‍?]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52350.html Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:29:07 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52350.html https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52348.html Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:22:33 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52348.html
Neighbours and a person from a nearby industrial business helped rescue the two elderly residents from the home, he added.

Cunliffe said they were both taken to the hospital, with one in “critical, life-threatening” condition and the other in serious condition.

Speaking to CP24, local resident Frank recalled hearing a loud “whoomp” before witnessing the home’s front windows blown completely onto the lawn.]]>
Neighbours and a person from a nearby industrial business helped rescue the two elderly residents from the home, he added.

Cunliffe said they were both taken to the hospital, with one in “critical, life-threatening” condition and the other in serious condition.

Speaking to CP24, local resident Frank recalled hearing a loud “whoomp” before witnessing the home’s front windows blown completely onto the lawn.]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52344.html Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:26:42 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52344.html
Guyanese-born Sita Singh Davenport, whose life took her from the theatre and beauty industry in Guyana to the world of modelling in London, has died at the age of 80.

Davenport, who was born in Guyana on August 25, 1946, passed away peacefully on October 1, 2026, in St. Petersburg, Florida, following a long illness, according to information provided by her family.

She was the daughter of Barrister-at-Law Sugrim Singh and Chandra Singh, and leaves behind her daughter, Gina Gajraj, along with her twin sister, Savitri Prashad, and siblings Dr. Ranjit Singh, Chiquita Rahaman, Kamal Mathews, Sorojini Alli, Andrani Singh, Nandini O'Connell, and Supriya Singh Bodden, CCH. Her brother Krishna Singh predeceased her.

Davenport's life reflected a combination of creativity, entrepreneurship and adventure. In the late 1960s, she contributed to Guyana's theatre arts, including an appearance in a production of Mother Courage. According to her family, her photograph remains displayed in the lobby of the Theatre Guild in Guyana.

She was also a trained esthetician and hairstylist who established Coiffure d'Elegance, which her family described as one of Guyana's early Parisian-inspired salons in the 1960s.

Her ambitions eventually took her beyond Guyana. Davenport moved to London, where she pursued a successful modelling career. Her family recalled a period of her life in early 1970s Europe that brought her into circles that included prominent singers, actors and other figures in the entertainment world.

But beyond the glamour and accomplishments of her earlier years, those closest to Davenport say her most enduring legacy was the compassion she showed toward others.

Her family described her as someone with a limitless capacity to care, who remained deeply devoted to relatives while also giving back to the communities in which she lived.

She is also mourned by her best friend, Ana Heitman Ardon, and numerous nieces and nephews.

In remembering Davenport's life, her family shared a simple message they say captured the mission by which she lived:

Let's remember the importance of simply being there for one another.

For those who knew and loved her, Sita Singh Davenport is remembered not only for a remarkable journey that stretched from Guyana to Europe and the United States, but for a life defined by family, creativity, generosity and human connection.

— NewsGuyana24 | Real, Raw & Relevant
NG24 Guyana's Breaking News @followers]]>
Guyanese-born Sita Singh Davenport, whose life took her from the theatre and beauty industry in Guyana to the world of modelling in London, has died at the age of 80.

Davenport, who was born in Guyana on August 25, 1946, passed away peacefully on October 1, 2026, in St. Petersburg, Florida, following a long illness, according to information provided by her family.

She was the daughter of Barrister-at-Law Sugrim Singh and Chandra Singh, and leaves behind her daughter, Gina Gajraj, along with her twin sister, Savitri Prashad, and siblings Dr. Ranjit Singh, Chiquita Rahaman, Kamal Mathews, Sorojini Alli, Andrani Singh, Nandini O'Connell, and Supriya Singh Bodden, CCH. Her brother Krishna Singh predeceased her.

Davenport's life reflected a combination of creativity, entrepreneurship and adventure. In the late 1960s, she contributed to Guyana's theatre arts, including an appearance in a production of Mother Courage. According to her family, her photograph remains displayed in the lobby of the Theatre Guild in Guyana.

She was also a trained esthetician and hairstylist who established Coiffure d'Elegance, which her family described as one of Guyana's early Parisian-inspired salons in the 1960s.

Her ambitions eventually took her beyond Guyana. Davenport moved to London, where she pursued a successful modelling career. Her family recalled a period of her life in early 1970s Europe that brought her into circles that included prominent singers, actors and other figures in the entertainment world.

But beyond the glamour and accomplishments of her earlier years, those closest to Davenport say her most enduring legacy was the compassion she showed toward others.

Her family described her as someone with a limitless capacity to care, who remained deeply devoted to relatives while also giving back to the communities in which she lived.

She is also mourned by her best friend, Ana Heitman Ardon, and numerous nieces and nephews.

In remembering Davenport's life, her family shared a simple message they say captured the mission by which she lived:

Let's remember the importance of simply being there for one another.

For those who knew and loved her, Sita Singh Davenport is remembered not only for a remarkable journey that stretched from Guyana to Europe and the United States, but for a life defined by family, creativity, generosity and human connection.

— NewsGuyana24 | Real, Raw & Relevant
NG24 Guyana's Breaking News @followers]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52340.html Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:07:32 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52340.html https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52186.html Mon, 05 Oct 2026 21:51:18 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52186.html
The Boeing 777 took off at 12:15 p.m. local time (7:15 a.m. ET) but started descending just 30 minutes later while flying over Ireland, according to flight-tracking website FlightAware.]]>
The Boeing 777 took off at 12:15 p.m. local time (7:15 a.m. ET) but started descending just 30 minutes later while flying over Ireland, according to flight-tracking website FlightAware.]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52160.html Fri, 02 Oct 2026 18:51:38 +0000 chairman]]> https://cricketwindies.com/thread-52160.html
Pheona came from Guyana to the U.S. as a child. Her family remembers someone who kept showing up for the people she loved, who visited her father every week, who was making plans for next summer. She deserved that summer, and so much more ❤️‍?

On September 30, Pheona was found fatally stabbed in her Queens home. Reporting identifies her boyfriend as the suspected attacker. We hold her loved ones in our hearts and extend our deepest condolences.

We are grieving. We are furious. As Domestic Violence Awareness Month begins, let our grief and rage move us toward collective care and action.

Believe survivors. Stay connected without judgment. Help make safety possible through money, housing, childcare, and access to support.

Stop asking women to endure harm to keep families together. Stop protecting reputations at the expense of women’s lives.

Men: challenge control, entitlement, and misogyny in your circles. Hold each other accountable. Teach boys that love never means ownership.

For Pheona, and everyone impacted, let us build a world where women can live freely, safely, and fully.

Support for #IndoCaribbean Women ? JAHAJEE Sakhi for South Asian Survivors South Queens Women’s March  

#DVAM #believesurvivors #domesticviolenceawareness #endgenderbasedviolence]]>
Pheona came from Guyana to the U.S. as a child. Her family remembers someone who kept showing up for the people she loved, who visited her father every week, who was making plans for next summer. She deserved that summer, and so much more ❤️‍?

On September 30, Pheona was found fatally stabbed in her Queens home. Reporting identifies her boyfriend as the suspected attacker. We hold her loved ones in our hearts and extend our deepest condolences.

We are grieving. We are furious. As Domestic Violence Awareness Month begins, let our grief and rage move us toward collective care and action.

Believe survivors. Stay connected without judgment. Help make safety possible through money, housing, childcare, and access to support.

Stop asking women to endure harm to keep families together. Stop protecting reputations at the expense of women’s lives.

Men: challenge control, entitlement, and misogyny in your circles. Hold each other accountable. Teach boys that love never means ownership.

For Pheona, and everyone impacted, let us build a world where women can live freely, safely, and fully.

Support for #IndoCaribbean Women ? JAHAJEE Sakhi for South Asian Survivors South Queens Women’s March  

#DVAM #believesurvivors #domesticviolenceawareness #endgenderbasedviolence]]>