![]() |
|
Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: Political Opinions, Commentaries on Current Issues (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: The Water Cooler! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! (/thread-5813.html) |
Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - ketchim - 05-03-2012 [size=10pt]Therefore, the PPP/C has only 44.44% representation with 32 seats APNU has the same 44.44% representation, but with only 26 seats : leading to a disproportionality of almost five seats....[/size] ::lol:: [size=10pt] However, the Chief Justice dismissed the motion and affirmed that : the Opposition was correct, in relation to law............[/size] ::redcard:: Re: Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - chairman - 05-03-2012 explain Re: Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - ketchim - 05-03-2012 [size=10pt]ACTING Chief Justice Ian Chang yesterday dismissed a Notice of Motion brought by Attorney General Anil Nandlall and ruled in favour of the Selection Committee Motion advocated by the Parliamentary Opposition.. [/size][size=10pt]The Government had submitted a Selection Committee of 10 .. with : (1) PPP/C - 5 (2) APNU - 4 (3) AFC - 1[/size] Re: Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - ketchim - 05-03-2012 [size=10pt]But the Opposition, with a single majority, proposed that the Committee be of the size of nine members, composed as follows. (1) PPP/C - 4 (2) APNU - 4 (3) AFC - 1[/size] Re: Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - ketchim - 05-03-2012 [size=10pt] The latter was preferred.............[/size] ::redcard:: |