Cricket Windies
Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - Printable Version

+- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com)
+-- Forum: Political Opinions, Commentaries on Current Issues (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: The Water Cooler! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Thread: Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! (/thread-5813.html)



Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - ketchim - 05-03-2012

[size=10pt]Therefore, the PPP/C has only 44.44%  representation with 32 seats

APNU has the same 44.44%  representation, but with only 26 seats :

leading to a  disproportionality of almost five seats....
[/size] ::lol::
[size=10pt]

However, the  Chief Justice dismissed  the motion and affirmed that :

the Opposition was correct, in relation to law............
[/size] ::redcard::


Re: Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - chairman - 05-03-2012

explain


Re: Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - ketchim - 05-03-2012

[size=10pt]ACTING Chief Justice  Ian Chang yesterday dismissed a Notice of Motion brought  by Attorney General  Anil Nandlall

and ruled in favour of the Selection Committee Motion advocated by the Parliamentary Opposition..

[/size][size=10pt]The Government had submitted a Selection Committee of 10 .. with :

(1)  PPP/C -  5
(2)  APNU  -  4
(3)  AFC    -  1
[/size]


Re: Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - ketchim - 05-03-2012

[size=10pt]But the Opposition, with a single majority, proposed that the Committee be of the size of nine members, composed  as follows.

(1)  PPP/C  -  4
(2)  APNU  -  4
(3)  AFC    -  1
[/size]


Re: Opposition was correct, in relation to law ! - ketchim - 05-03-2012

[size=10pt]
The latter was preferred.............
[/size] ::redcard::