![]() |
|
Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: What’s on Your Mind? (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: The Water Cooler! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal (/thread-32709.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - chairman - 10-02-2016 Voters in Colombia have rejected a landmark peace deal with Farc rebels in a shock referendum result, with 50.24% voting against it. The deal was signed last week by President Juan Manuel Santos and Farc leader Timoleon Jimenez after nearly four years of negotiations. But it needed to be ratified by Colombians in order to come into force. Addressing the nation, President Santos accepted the result but said he would continue working to achieve peace. He said the current ceasefire remained in place and that he had ordered negotiators to travel to Cuba to consult Farc leaders on the next move. Re: Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - mapoui - 10-02-2016 dat is ah sooprise of the first order : : :
Re: Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - Kwami - 10-02-2016 [quote author=mapoui link=topic=106410.msg715181#msg715181 date=1475460273] dat is ah sooprise of the first order : : :![]() [/quote] I am surprised that you are surprised. Your reaction should have been that the Americans would want a continued conflict in their destabilisation of Latin America and somehow rigged the referendum with the Dibold voting machines Re: Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - mapoui - 10-02-2016 Quote:I am surprised that you are surprised. Your reaction should have been that the Americans would want a continued conflict in their destabilisation of Latin America and somehow rigged the referendum with the Dibold voting machines definitely. you have a point there but I have taken for granted that Colombia put a reasonably fair process in place... or tried to. and no doubt there were international observers etc..Jimmy Carter's people in particular if the american government had anything to do with it it chances are it was not a fair process Re: Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - Captain - 10-03-2016 yep the americanos had the ballots stolen Re: Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - mapoui - 10-03-2016 .... sooprised because it seems the people are seriously tired of the war. man it has been going on forever. I expected an overwhelming end of the war vote that no manipulation cud sunder. but we will see. stay tuned!
Re: Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - mapoui - 10-03-2016 i fuhget to mention dat Cuba is involved centrally in the Colombian peace process..and a lot of other parties who are very keen on proper elections...verifiable elections. I never saw america with a full hand in organizing that election. to my mind all parties concerned wud have been keen to keep america out of that. the only interest in that process I saw as overtly even rabidly pro american is Alvaro Uribe the former Colombian president who is a rabid and particularly nasty right winger. anything american in Colombia is possible through Uribe. but I did not think he had so much remaining power as to be able to influence the election decisively Re: Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - royston - 10-03-2016 According to an article in Reuters today only one-third of eligible voters cast votes. Hopefully the government will demand more from FARC - such as clawing back all the property and money they stole over the last 40+ years to rejuvenate the small villages and towns they decimated - and have a new peace deal. No one wins in war. Re: Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - mapoui - 10-03-2016 Quote:http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/10/03/plan-colombia-vindicated-colombia-rejects-peace/ Quote:Rio Hacha, Colombia. Re: Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal - mapoui - 10-03-2016 now we have an idea of why there was a low turnout...Intimidation of the voting public. ![]() we will see more soon I am sure!
|