Cricket Windies
Pakistan have been fined for a slow over rate during their final-Test - Printable Version

+- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com)
+-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Pakistan have been fined for a slow over rate during their final-Test (/thread-32129.html)



Pakistan have been fined for a slow over rate during their final-Test - myballfield - 08-15-2016

Pakistan have been fined for a slow over rate during their final-Test win against England at The Oval.

Match referee Richie Richardson ruled that Misbah-ul-Haq's team were one over short of their target figure, despite time allowances being considered.

Misbah was fined 20% of his match fee and if a further over rate offence occurs within 12 months under his captaincy he will face a suspension.

His team-mates were each fined 10% of their match fees.

Pakistan won the match by 10 wickets to draw the series


Re: Pakistan have been fined for a slow over rate during their final-Test - pwarbi - 08-16-2016

Fines for a slow over rate have been in place for a while now, and even though the fines implemented in this game seem a little harsh on this occasion. I guess everyone playing knows the rules so there's no excuse these days for a low over rate, and just because players might not agree with them, the rules are there for a reason and so should be adhered to.

Across most sports I think there tends to be certain rules and regulations that fans and players don't like, and while they are there for a reason, on a lot of occasions they are actually detrimental to the game.


Re: Pakistan have been fined for a slow over rate during their final-Test - ketchim - 08-16-2016

I cannot see how a game WON withover 3 sessions LEFT

could see the winning team incur a FINE for bowling a slow over rate  ??????


IF it sounds stupid, then the by law is an ass !


Re: Pakistan have been fined for a slow over rate during their final-Test - ketchim - 08-16-2016

[quote author=ballfield link=topic=105774.msg709377#msg709377 date=1471272356]
Match referee Richie Richardson ruled that Misbah-ul-Haq's team were one over short
of their target figure, despite time allowances being considered.
[/quote]

Then again, its Richie Rich being nijjerly  Tongue


Re: Pakistan have been fined for a slow over rate during their final-Test - ketchim - 08-16-2016

[quote author=ketchim link=topic=105774.msg709485#msg709485 date=1471353508]
could see the winning team incur a FINE for bowling a slow over rate  ??????
[/quote]

wonder what the by law says about the Batting team ??

and what FINE should be imposed upon them for short changing Fans :

3 sessions or a FULL day of Cricket  Tongue

[quote author=ballfield link=topic=105774.msg709377#msg709377 date=1471272356]
[size=10pt] time allowances being considered.[/size]
[/quote]


Re: Pakistan have been fined for a slow over rate during their final-Test - mapoui - 08-16-2016

Sir Richard Richardson is a Tom..has always been.  he will play by no rules other that those of the establishment.

phuck him! nutten bettah is to be expected from him >Sad >Sad >Sad


Re: Pakistan have been fined for a slow over rate during their final-Test - dillinger10 - 08-16-2016

[quote author=pwarbi link=topic=105774.msg709481#msg709481 date=1471336705]
Fines for a slow over rate have been in place for a while now, and even though the fines implemented in this game seem a little harsh on this occasion. I guess everyone playing knows the rules so there's no excuse these days for a low over rate, and just because players might not agree with them, the rules are there for a reason and so should be adhered to.

Across most sports I think there tends to be certain rules and regulations that fans and players don't like, and while they are there for a reason, on a lot of occasions they are actually detrimental to the game.
[/quote]
The problem is, England escaped punishment for their slow-over rate at Edgbaston. You can't have one rule for the Big 3, and one rule for the others.