![]() |
|
Australia v India, 5th ODI, Sydney - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Australia v India, 5th ODI, Sydney (/thread-28921.html) |
Australia v India, 5th ODI, Sydney - DownUnda - 01-22-2016 Aus goes for the sweep... Numbers Game: In the last two years, Australia have a 29-2 win-loss record in home ODIs, with their batsmen scoring 17 hundreds http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia-v-india-2015-16/content/story/964245.html Re: Australia v India, 5th ODI, Sydney - DownUnda - 01-22-2016 Ind won the toss and elect to bowl Re: Australia v India, 5th ODI, Sydney - 1shanemarsh - 01-23-2016 Baggy green not chasing this time Re: Australia v India, 5th ODI, Sydney - chairman - 01-23-2016 Australia 235/4 (38.4 ov) Re: Australia v India, 5th ODI, Sydney - ketchim - 01-23-2016 India won by 6 wickets :with 2 balls remaining !! India finally slotted in the right players. V Pandey 104* Re: Australia v India, 5th ODI, Sydney - VEddie - 01-24-2016 Australia goes for a sweep!? Now they all go for a sleep instead. Fun aside, India was very unlucky to lose the toss in the first three matches. They had no idea, how much could be a competitive score on those pitches. Both teams had equally toothless bowling attack on those heartless pitches. Did you see how many runs were scored, how many centuries made! That was a crazy run fest. It was funny how people started blaming Dhoni for the loss of the fourth match. Finally some respite for the Indians. : :-\
Re: Australia v India, 5th ODI, Sydney - ranjha - 01-24-2016 Manish Pandey great batting underpressure against Australia. I hope pandey selected in PSL T20 Re: Australia v India, 5th ODI, Sydney - ketchim - 01-24-2016 [quote author=VEddie link=topic=102264.msg675202#msg675202 date=1453618820] Australia goes for a sweep!? Now they all go for a sleep instead. [/quote] lol.....in addition to wrong Selections of the upper middle order ! |