![]() |
|
Slave Trade Revisionism ! - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: What’s on Your Mind? (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: The Water Cooler! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Slave Trade Revisionism ! (/thread-28835.html) |
Slave Trade Revisionism ! - ketchim - 01-16-2016 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/06/us/publisher-promises-revisions-after-textbook-refers-to-african-slaves-as-workers.html?WT.mc_id=2016-KWP-INTL_AUD_DEV&WT.mc_ev=click&ad-keywords=IntlAudDev&kwp_0=85438&kwp_4=450660&kwp_1=253752&_r=0 “we was real hard workers, wasn’t we.†:-[ Re: Slave Trade Revisionism ! - ketchim - 01-16-2016 Europeans were "indentured labour "..... :
Re: Slave Trade Revisionism ! - ketchim - 01-17-2016 So lets eliminate the word SLAVE : from all books ...not only McGraw Hill
Re: Slave Trade Revisionism ! - briannagodess - 01-18-2016 I think history should be told as it is. And this is one case of where history is changed a bit just to gloss over important information, which in this case is slavery. I commend the young boy for seeing this mistake of the book publisher and helping to maintain the history as what it should be. Re: Slave Trade Revisionism ! - ketchim - 01-18-2016 [quote author=briannagodess link=topic=102172.msg674261#msg674261 date=1453136703] I think history should be told as it is. [/quote] Agreed ! |