![]() |
|
4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: 4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart (/thread-22671.html) |
4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - chairman - 01-23-2015 60/0 after 8.4 england Re: 4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - chairman - 01-23-2015 6666 6666 666 aliiiiiiiii on fire Re: 4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - anandgb - 01-23-2015 112/0 after 17.1 Re: 4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - chairman - 01-23-2015 183/2 Re: 4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - dillinger10 - 01-23-2015 England finish on 303/8. They lost their way in the final 10 overs (scoring just 59 runs) and the score looks to be maybe 15 runs light. Good to see Bell in the runs again. Re: 4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - ketchim - 01-23-2015 Australia 304-7 after 49.5 overs Steve Smith 102* Australia won with 1 ball remaining ! Re: 4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - TRINIDADDY - 01-23-2015 England did really well, I thought. They have quite a strong batting line up now. Australia, meanwhile, fielded a slightly under-strength team and still won. Re: 4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - dillinger10 - 01-23-2015 Bell finding form would be a huge boost to the batting lineup. I am still concerned with the front line seamers, Broad has not looked great and I am not convinced Woakes is good enough. Re: 4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - ketchim - 01-24-2015 [quote author=dillinger10 link=topic=95312.msg614102#msg614102 date=1422053405] I am still concerned with the front line seamers, [/quote] It is a cause for concern... Re: 4th Match: Australia v England at Hobart - dillinger10 - 01-24-2015 I understand why England don't want to use two spinners in their bowling attack but by dropping Treadwell they are omitting one of their most economical bowlers (4.77). By comparison, Broad is at 5.25 and Woakes at 5.80. |