![]() |
|
Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: What’s on Your Mind? (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: The Water Cooler! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? (/thread-16576.html) |
Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - Googley - 03-06-2014 How come you have not congratulated the WI Wicket Keeper for such an outstanding inning?? You Shame? Re: Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - bagaloo - 03-06-2014 why you expecting so much? Re: Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - ketchim - 03-06-2014 [img alt=link]http://caribbeancricket.com/images/walcott/forum/icon_minipost_new.gif[/img] jala 3/6/14 7:47:58 AM [img alt=avatar image]http://caribbeancricket.com/images/avatars/jala.jpg[/img] Jeff Dujon 169 matches = @23.15 ave 49/169 matches were DNB = 29% 36/169 matches were not outs = 21% 36/120 innings were not outs = 30% scores over 50 = 5% of the time It means Jeff Dujon not dismissed 50% of the matches he played, and 30% of the innings he batted. Dinesh Ramdin 109 matches @ 21.65 ave. 28/109 matches were DNB = 26% 15/109 matches were not outs = 14% 15/81 innings were no outs = 18% scores over 50 = 4.9% of the time It means that Dinesh Ramdin was not dismissed 40% of the matches he played, 18% of the innings he played. It means tha Dujon batted less (3%) than Ramdin, was not out more (12%) make what you will of these stats... Not sure of any errors were made... while computing.. Re: Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - bagaloo - 03-06-2014 hahahaha caught with his pants down Re: Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - ketchim - 03-06-2014 Ramesh had an epiphany since the Gun hold up in broad daylight ![]() e·piph·a·ny [ih-pif-uh-nee] A sudden insight into the reality or essential meaning of something, usually initiated by some occurrence or experience. 8) Re: Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - Googley - 03-07-2014 Ramesh born again, eh Ketch? 8) Re: Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - ramesh - 03-07-2014 I indeed will congratulate Ramdin on his milestone, He is now applying himself at the batting crease but praise must go to coach Gibson for molding him to what he has become. I an sure that his insult to Richards with his " talk nah " was an epiphany plus the careful nurturing of Coach Gibson had an effect Re: Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - Googley - 03-07-2014 Ramesh, coach Gipson? Have you lost your mind? Coach Gipson know NOTHING about batting! here is who is coaching the boys! ![]() Re: Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - ketchim - 03-07-2014 Oh boy ! .....you gonna mekk ramesh very disappointed at his Idol Opisss pic not being there ! :-[ Re: Ramesh, no congratulations to Ramdin? - ramesh - 03-07-2014 There is only one person of color who is a head coach of a test playing nation and that person is Gibson. He earned his stripes in making the England bowling a good unit . Sooner or later he will r transform the West Indies into a formidable power |