![]() |
|
Let the bowlers bat first - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Let the bowlers bat first (/thread-16482.html) |
Let the bowlers bat first - TRINIDADDY - 03-02-2014 [size=18pt]Our top order needs to bat after the bowlers. Edwards, Darren, Samuels, Gayle, Powell and Charles cant make runs consistently. [/size] Re: Let the bowlers bat first - Calypso - 03-03-2014 [quote author=TRINIDADDY link=topic=88059.msg552232#msg552232 date=1393776979] Our top order needs to bat after the bowlers. Edwards, Darren, Samuels, Gayle, Powell and Charles cant make runs consistently. [/quote] Haha!! ... Ottiss' bowling coaching skills turning the bowlers into batsmen ?? ![]() He now needs to work on the bowling skills of the top order .... ;D
Re: Let the bowlers bat first - Kyle - 03-04-2014 Might as well play an XI of bowlers then ![]() I sometimes wonder though, captains even make bizarre and funny moves like letting keepers bowl - but not this. I can't think of any time when this has been tried out. Of course there's the famous Bradman tactic of reversing the order, using bowlers as a front to get through the tough phase. I guess that kind of move is moot now with covered pitches and all that. Re: Let the bowlers bat first - TRINIDADDY - 03-05-2014 I told you the top order needed protection. Batting the bowlers first woulda given us 50 quick runs in the first 6 overs. Re: Let the bowlers bat first - bagaloo - 03-05-2014 ::confused:: |