Cricket Windies
Why Did Ramdin Field First? - Printable Version

+- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com)
+-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Why Did Ramdin Field First? (/thread-22061.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


Re: Why Did Ramdin Field First? - mapoui - 12-19-2014

[quote author=Mail link=topic=94601.msg606615#msg606615 date=1419030136]
Ha ha ha!

Had I been Captain I would have done the same thing to take advantage of the overhead condition even if I were the top team!

In the three days of this match, the first morning did the most but Ramdin's bowlers did not produce!

I was, however, surprised Roach did not open!

Do you know what that was all about?

[/quote]


Sir Curtley Ambrose..that likely, is what that was all about.

Sir Ambrose has taken a liking to Cottrell and with the supposed Saffie weakness to left arm pace he no doubt 'suggested' the new ball be given to Cotts
Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin


Re: Why Did Ramdin Field First? - Calypso - 12-20-2014

Did I just hear Cappo Amla say had he won the toss he would've bowled also ??/ :-\


Re: Why Did Ramdin Field First? - ketchim - 12-20-2014

Yes ....Amla would have Bowl .

but for different reasons than Ramdin :-[