![]() |
|
Why Did Ramdin Field First? - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Why Did Ramdin Field First? (/thread-22061.html) |
Re: Why Did Ramdin Field First? - mapoui - 12-19-2014 [quote author=Mail link=topic=94601.msg606615#msg606615 date=1419030136] Ha ha ha! Had I been Captain I would have done the same thing to take advantage of the overhead condition even if I were the top team! In the three days of this match, the first morning did the most but Ramdin's bowlers did not produce! I was, however, surprised Roach did not open! Do you know what that was all about? [/quote] Sir Curtley Ambrose..that likely, is what that was all about. Sir Ambrose has taken a liking to Cottrell and with the supposed Saffie weakness to left arm pace he no doubt 'suggested' the new ball be given to Cotts
Re: Why Did Ramdin Field First? - Calypso - 12-20-2014 Did I just hear Cappo Amla say had he won the toss he would've bowled also ??/ :-\ Re: Why Did Ramdin Field First? - ketchim - 12-20-2014 Yes ....Amla would have Bowl . but for different reasons than Ramdin :-[ |