![]() |
|
India at 69 a failed destiny! - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: What’s on Your Mind? (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: The Water Cooler! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: India at 69 a failed destiny! (/thread-29732.html) |
Re: India at 69 a failed destiny! - mapoui - 03-09-2016 Is this girl African or not ::confused:: ::confused:: http://archaeology.about.com/od/indusrivercivilizations/a/dancinggirl.htm Quote:Archaeologists in LoveShe was British archaeologist Mortimer Wheeler's favorite statuette, as you can tell in this quote from a 1973 television program: Re: India at 69 a failed destiny! - ketchim - 03-09-2016 Booty too Flat . She is an FBI (flat batty indian)
Re: India at 69 a failed destiny! - mapoui - 03-09-2016 who were the original settlers of the Indus Valley ::confused:: Dr A Sagayadoss: http://www.realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Indus_Valley_India_1.htm Quote:Introduction: Re: India at 69 a failed destiny! - mapoui - 03-09-2016 Quote:Booty too Flat . Dravidians are FBI too.... there is no escape..... ::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL:: Re: India at 69 a failed destiny! - ketchim - 03-09-2016 Indian has more physical similarity to Caucasian. than Negroid or Mongoloid. Re: India at 69 a failed destiny! - mapoui - 03-09-2016 [quote author=ketchim link=topic=103174.msg683203#msg683203 date=1457532677] Indian has more physical similarity to Caucasian. than Negroid or Mongoloid. [/quote] really..so where did the caucasian come from...to who does flat or high-bungshus come from ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused:: no matter where I turn or how far back we go all I find at the bottom of every pile are nig nogs. wats your point den ::confused:: ::confused:: Re: India at 69 a failed destiny! - mapoui - 03-09-2016 dat is my point..the point that phenotype proves. look at allyuh selves nuh! deh say no white invasion circa 3500 years ago..16-15 BC. but how to explain the color spectrum of the Stans, Arabia, Turkey, Iran. forget the booty protuberances by size..check the melanin! ::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL:: Re: India at 69 a failed destiny! - ketchim - 03-09-2016 My point is thru direct Eye contact : Indo and Afro physical features are Opposed Hair type , nostrils, forehead ,bone structure (melanin depens onthe geography) as compared with Caucasian Unless you blind piss on 3500 BC : I talking whats in fron of me March 8 2016 Re: India at 69 a failed destiny! - mapoui - 03-09-2016 [quote author=ketchim link=topic=103174.msg683211#msg683211 date=1457533663] My point is thru direct Eye contact : Indo and Afro physical features are Opposed Hair type , nostrils, forehead , bone structure . as compared with Caucasian Unless you blind piss on 3500 BC : I talking whats in fron of me March 8 2016 [/quote] it you who bline..who cyar read what I said. also who not reading properly all the links. who is Indian..what is Indian ::confused:: ::confused:: no one thing deh tell you. and the story works itself out unless you have reasoning difficulties..and I don't think you. now emotional ability to deal with what your mind works out for you is anther story all together Re: India at 69 a failed destiny! - ketchim - 03-09-2016 Who or what is Indian is IRRELEVANT Indian and Negroid have absolutely ZERO commonality. Physically and genetically . FACTUM |