![]() |
|
Wicket-keeping is not a dying art: Dujon - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Wicket-keeping is not a dying art: Dujon (/thread-11770.html) |
Re: Wicket-keeping is not a dying art: Dujon - Captain - 07-09-2013 it they way gibson thinks him and sammy probably did this to spite the TnT cappos Re: Wicket-keeping is not a dying art: Dujon - chairman - 11-23-2016 Gilchrist changed how people think about the role of a wicket keeper. He had an average of 47 and a strike rate over 80 in Test cricket. He was also very good with the gloves. He isn't the best wicket keeper in history but he is easily the best wicket keeper/batsman. Re: Wicket-keeping is not a dying art: Dujon - mapoui - 11-23-2016 [quote author=CHAIRMAN link=topic=81650.msg720660#msg720660 date=1479941395] Gilchrist changed how people think about the role of a wicket keeper. He had an average of 47 and a strike rate over 80 in Test cricket. He was also very good with the gloves. He isn't the best wicket keeper in history but he is easily the best wicket keeper/batsman. [/quote] no sir! there was a south african test by the name of Dennis Lindsay. to be best Gilchrist wud have to deal with him. I dont thing Gilchrist wud come out on top |