![]() |
|
Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? (/thread-29738.html) |
Re: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - chairman - 03-09-2016 44444444444444 Re: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - chairman - 03-09-2016 666666666666 Re: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - dillinger10 - 03-09-2016 What an upset. Disaster for Ireland. Shocker. They couldn't defend 14 off the last over. Re: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - chairman - 03-09-2016 amazing Re: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - ketchim - 03-09-2016 They could but he bowled 5 wides :-[ 19.5 Sorensen to Ansari, 5 no balls, another full-toss, beats the batsman, nutmegs the keeper.... Oman have won! Re: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - ketchim - 03-09-2016 Aamer Ali, the Man of the Match, says, through a translator : "God was with us and we were trying to get boundaries every over. We have done a lot of hard work before coming to the World Cup, and finally it has paid off."
Re: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - 239pitch - 03-09-2016 Oman, never has a team looked like, or played like, a team of accountants more, and done so well. Re: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - ketchim - 03-09-2016 Blame Phil Simmons for this ::LOL:: Re: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - Personablue - 03-10-2016 I consider Ireland a spot above Zimbabwe. They constantly perform well in all their test. Their matches are never one sides like UAE etc. They defeated many top nations like Pakistan, WI. I think they are in a strong position to qualify for the super 10 Re: Can Ireland make a winning start against Oman? - 239pitch - 03-12-2016 I wish we could stop calling them 'associates' and 'affiliates' to start with. These terms merely legitimise their blatant exclusion |