Cricket Windies
We aint taking any wickets without Taylor - Printable Version

+- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com)
+-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: We aint taking any wickets without Taylor (/thread-24391.html)

Pages: 1 2


Re: We aint taking any wickets without Taylor - ketchim - 04-24-2015

Roach 100 Up ! : NO wickets taken ...


Re: We aint taking any wickets without Taylor - mapoui - 04-24-2015

maybe Roach will take a bunch at kensington


Re: We aint taking any wickets without Taylor - Captain - 04-26-2015

And Bishoo back to the bench


Re: We aint taking any wickets without Taylor - Captain - 04-26-2015

Permaul,Bishoo,Roach and Taylor in Bridgetown


Re: We aint taking any wickets without Taylor - ketchim - 04-26-2015

So our Bowling under the Coaching of Curtly Ambrose :

managed 8 out of 20 OUTS , that is 40 % of the requirement !

Naturally we lost by 10 wickets  :-[



Re: We aint taking any wickets without Taylor - ketchim - 04-26-2015

Bishoo took 4 out of the 8 : 50% after bowling 50 something overs !

I understand his Finger fell off !  :-[



Re: We aint taking any wickets without Taylor - ketchim - 04-26-2015

Change the Ball , TD  Wink


Re: We aint taking any wickets without Taylor - biplob - 04-27-2015

Unfortunately Holder is better than Sammy batting wise & bowling at par. Always a issue where to fit in such cricketers. Ideally he should be batting at 6/7 to give balance to the squad. Then Ramdin no better batting wise & tail gets exposed